From: tom cheung (tkc9789@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Feb 02 2002 - 23:22:22 GMT-3
This to to bypass NAT for traffic to be encrypted. For example, if you have
a HQ site and a remote location communicating over the Internet using IPSec,
all inter-company traffic (private to private) will be encrypted and no
NATting is needed. For other outbound Internet traffic, you do want to NAT
the private address space to the registered address and send them to the ISP
instead of over the VPN tunnel.
HTH
Tom
>From: RSiddappa@NECBNS.com
>Reply-To: RSiddappa@NECBNS.com
>To: signal@shreve.net, cchurch@MAGNACOM.com
>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: IPSec & NAT
>Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 19:28:27 -0600
>
>hi Guys,
>
>Can some one explain me what's happing with the following 110 access-list.
>
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/707/overload_private.shtml
>
>
>
>Rajeev.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:10 GMT-3