From: Chuck Church (cchurch@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Feb 02 2002 - 23:15:22 GMT-3
Rajeev,
While the access-list has nothing to do with B&B, it's purpose is to
prevent the router from NATing packets that are destined to the remote LAN.
The theory is to encrypt but not NAT packets going to the remote LANs.
Since they're moving over an IPSec 'tunnel', they don't need to be NATed to
traverse the internet. Packets not going to the remote LANs are assumed to
be heading to the internet, so they're NATed, but not encryted.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: RSiddappa@NECBNS.com [mailto:RSiddappa@NECBNS.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 8:27 PM
To: signal@shreve.net; cchurch@MAGNACOM.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: OT: Beavis and Butthead crash dump
hi Guys,
Can some one explain me what's happing with the following 110 access-list.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/707/overload_private.shtml
Rajeev.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 13:46:10 GMT-3