From: kyle prevey (preveyk@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jan 13 2002 - 19:31:16 GMT-3
If you are worried about jitter (due to queueing) with voice then you need
to use some type of LFI. This will cut down on it. Plus there are
additional ways to guarantee bandwidth for a session.
Kyle
From: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki <karwas@ifxcorp.com>
To: kyle prevey <preveyk@hotmail.com>
CC: labccie@yahoo.com, ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Traffic Shaping
Date: 13 Jan 2002 09:44:26 -0500
I dont know exact specifics of cisco implementation of
traffic-shape but if you will queue packets you will
definitelly increase jitter.
How does such traffic shape works for VoIP traffic?
Does the queuing mechanism differentiate properly
between VoIP traffic and the other traffic?
Przemek
On Sat, 2002-01-12 at 20:36, kyle prevey wrote:
> the first command is for shaping traffic and places extra traffic in a
> queue, the other command is traffic policing and either discards the
traffic
> or rewrites the ip precendenc/tos bits. The traffic shaping is a gentler
> tool that allows the data to still get to its inteded destination.
>
> Kyle
>
>
> From: Lab Candidate <labccie@yahoo.com>
> Reply-To: Lab Candidate <labccie@yahoo.com>
> To: g <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Subject: Traffic Shaping
> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 17:01:40 -0800 (PST)
>
> what is the difference of the following two methods for controlling
traffic?
>
> interface serial 4/1:0
> traffic-shape rate 64000 6400 6400
>
> and
>
> interface serial 4/1:0
> rate-limit output 64000 6400 6400 conform transmit exceed drop
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:27 GMT-3