how deeply do I have to consider to resolve any loop problem

From: À̵¿À± (dleedlee@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jan 12 2002 - 08:36:50 GMT-3

• Next message: Markus Haas: "AW: DLSW mac-address filter"
• Previous message: Waters, Kivas (UK72): "RE: DLSW mac-address filter"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Happy New Year all,

I'd like to know that how deeply do I have to consider to resolve any
loop problem in case of multiple routing protocol's redistribution on
the looped diagram.

I means, if routers have several paths to a network and multiple routing
protocols are redistributed each other at the all routers related with
the protocol, are any routers able to have to reach all network if any
path is existing to the network after several paths down.

Please comments from you.

dleedlee

         <http://www.korea.com> DZ8.>F4B 4g=E@; ;g6{GU4O4Y
---------------------------------------
=E3*4B 0T@S, 9]0!?n D#18, 1W 8p5g 0M@L @L0w?!!
4kG% 0T@S 8^0! FwE; http://game.korea.com

• Next message: Markus Haas: "AW: DLSW mac-address filter"
• Previous message: Waters, Kivas (UK72): "RE: DLSW mac-address filter"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:26 GMT-3