From: Nabil Bukhari (nabil_bukhari@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jan 12 2002 - 03:41:56 GMT-3
i have found jeff doyle vol 2 to be very informative as far as
redistribution is concerned maybe u can consult that
Nabil Bukhari
>From: Bill Ng >Reply-To: Bill Ng >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com >Subject:
CCIE lab questions >Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 21:25:13 -0800 (PST) > >Do you
have recommendations on literature covering >mutual redistribution on a
practical hands-on lab >aspect between BGP and IGP's? > >I'm not sure
when to redistribute the IGP >into BGP and vice versa if the directions
>ask to redistribute BGP and the IGP so >all interfaces can be reached
from any router. > >In lab 8, step 19 we're asked to redistribute b/t
>BGP & OSPF. > >mutual redistribution is done on R1 & R6 >which makes
sense because these are the only 2 routers > >running BGP & OSPF. > >In
lab 2, only R4 & R6 does redistribution into BGP >while there are other
routers running both BGP and >IGP. > > >---------------- >
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/52.html > >describes solving the
VLSM problem with static routes. > >Lab 8 has a VLSM scenario where the
IGRP network has a >longer >subnet mask than the OSPF network. It is
resolved by >using passive-int >under IGRP for interfaces that are
running OSPF and >denying these same >networks from being redistributed
from IGRP back into >OSPF. > >What are the advantages of each approach? >
>Can both approaches be used in all scenarios if the >directions do not
>prevent using either approach? > >Which labs reflect the changes made by
Cisco to remove >certain >technologies in the CCIE lab:
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/625/ccie/certifications/routing.html
> >Any suggestions on how to prepare differently given >the change to lab
exam >change from 2 days to 1 day. > >Thank you. > >Bill > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:26 GMT-3