From: Rajeev Siddappa (raj_lab@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 10 2002 - 12:24:11 GMT-3
Hi,
This is interesting, becsue even after this
configuration the maks of OSPF side network will be
/16 and rip has /24 mask and it will never understnd
the 172.16.0.0 network.
And one more thing, u do not need to add the
192.168.1.0 network under OSPF.
I think PARRY is the right person to help about this.
Rajeev
--- Jeongwoo Park <Jpark@wams.com> wrote:
> Here is the latest config. But still not working.
> R1;
> interface Loopback1
> ip address 192.168.3.20 255.255.255.0
> !
> interface Ethernet0
> ip address 192.168.1.249 255.255.255.0
> !
> router rip
> network 192.168.1.0
> network 192.168.3.0
> !
> ip http server
> ip classless
> !
> alias exec b sh ip int brie
> alias exec r sh ip route
> !
> line con 0
> password xxx
> transport input none
> stopbits 1
> line vty 0 4
> exec-timeout 0 0
> password xxx
> login
> !
> end
>
> R1's routing table;
> Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP,
> M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA
> - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF
> NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external
> type 2, E - EGP
> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS
> level-2, ia - IS-IS inter
> area
> * - candidate default, U - per-user static
> route, o - ODR
> P - periodic downloaded static route
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Ethernet0
> C 192.168.3.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1
>
> R2;
> router ospf 1
> log-adjacency-changes
> network 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
> !
> router ospf 2
> log-adjacency-changes
> summary-address 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0
> redistribute ospf 1 subnets
> network 172.16.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
> network 192.68.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> !
> router rip
> redistribute ospf 2
> network 192.168.1.0
>
> I am still struggling with this
> Could you some show me the working config?
>
> JP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: scott mann [mailto:smann0762@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 2:15 PM
> To: Jpark@wams.com; chris_aguillo@alfalak.com;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RE: Redistribute ospf1-> ospf2->rip
>
> Here is why it is not working;
>
> You ethernet inteface to R1 is class C /24 by
> default 192.168.1.0/24.
>
> The Loopbacks are /28 being summarized into class C
> /24, but the network
> classful address is 172.16.0.0 or class B /16. Rip
> will only accept /24
> routes from a neighbor if the Network is a class C
> network 192-223 OR -> if
> the interface is a different class (say 10.1.1.1/24)
> but has a class C (/24)
>
> mask -> then other 10.1.x.x/24 will be sent.
>
> The ethernet interface to R1 is 192 or class C by
> default, so only classfull
>
> addresses will be sent to the neighbor ..i.e.
> 172.16.0.0/16 NOT
> 172.16.1.0/24. You have to summarize to /16 or give
> the ethernet interface a
>
> 172.16.x.x/24 address.
>
> Scott
>
>
> >From: Jeongwoo Park <Jpark@wams.com>
> >Reply-To: Jeongwoo Park <Jpark@wams.com>
> >To: "'Christian C. Aguillo'"
> <chris_aguillo@alfalak.com>,
> >"'ccielab@groupstudy.com'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Subject: RE: Redistribute ospf1-> ospf2->rip
> >Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 10:51:12 -0800
> >
> >router ospf 1
> > log-adjacency-changes
> > redistribute ospf 2
> > network 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.15 area 0
> > network 172.16.1.16 0.0.0.15 area 0
> > network 172.16.1.32 0.0.0.15 area 0
> >!
> >router ospf 2
> > log-adjacency-changes
> > summary-address 172.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
> > redistribute ospf 1
> > redistribute rip
> > passive-interface Vlan1
> > network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> >!
> >router rip
> > redistribute ospf 2
> > network 192.168.1.0
> >!
> >Unfortunately it is not working either. Thanks for
> the input thought.
> >
> >JP
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Christian C. Aguillo
> [mailto:chris_aguillo@alfalak.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 3:55 AM
> >To: Jeongwoo Park
> >Subject: Re: Redistribute ospf1-> ospf2->rip
> >
> >This is how I do it on R2:
> >
> >ip classless
> >
> >router ospf 1
> > network 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.15 area 0
> > network 172.16.1.16 0.0.0.15 area 0
> > network 172.16.1.32.0 0.0.0.15 area 0
> > redistribute ospf 2
> >
> >router ospf 2
> > redistribute ospf 1
> > summary-address 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0
> > redistribute rip
> > passive interface e0
> > network 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> >
> >router rip
> > redistribute ospf 2
> > network 192.168.1.0
> >
> >pls let me know coz I don't have routers to play
> with.
> >
> >Chris
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Jeongwoo Park" <Jpark@wams.com>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Cc: "'Stephen C. Feldberg'"
> <scfeldberg@hotmail.com>
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 1:19 PM
> >Subject: Redistribute ospf1-> ospf2->rip
> >
> >
> > > Hi all
> > > Here is the scenario.
> > > Loopbacks
> > > R1(e0)-----------(e0)R2------172.16.1.1/28
> > >
> 172.16.1.17/28
> > >
> 172.16.1.33/28
> > > What I want to do is ultimately to redistribute
> these three loopback
> > > networks into rip.
> > > R2 is ASBR running ospf and rip. R1 is running
> only rip.
> > > As the people on this list recommended, I first
> created ospf 2 and
> > > redistributed ospf 1 into ospf 2. And during
> this redistribution from
> >ospf2
> > > to ospf1, I summarized three loopback networks
> to the classful address (
> > > 172.16.0.0/16) And I redistributed ospf 2 into
> rip.
>
=== message truncated ===
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:23 GMT-3