From: tom cheung (tkc9789@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 08 2002 - 14:20:22 GMT-3
Dan,
I think that'll work also.
Tom
>From: "DAN DORTON" <DHSTS68@dhs.state.il.us>
>Reply-To: "DAN DORTON" <DHSTS68@dhs.state.il.us>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>, <tkc9789@hotmail.com>, <euchime@yahoo.com>
>Subject: Re: Simple OSPF Redistribution to RIP
>Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 10:39:15 -0600
>
>Whoops... The 168,16 threw me off. I didn't read close enough to see the
>168, as opposed to the 16.
>
>Couldn't you use secondary addresses in the 172.16.0.0 network, or create a
>loopback with a similar mask on the RIP participating router so then?
>
>Dan
>
> >>> "tom cheung" <tkc9789@hotmail.com> 01/08/02 10:29AM >>>
>Dan,
>If you notice this is RIPv1 not RIPv2. And according to Elias, "Rip is
>running only 172.168.x.x". With this in mind, when you redistribute from
>OSPF(VLSM) to RIP (FLSM) across an interface which knows nothing about
>172.16.x.x, then RIP will only learn about the "natural" mask. In this
>case, it's class B, which is 172.16.0.0.
>
>Tom
>
> >From: "DAN DORTON" <DHSTS68@dhs.state.il.us>
> >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>,<tkc9789@hotmail.com>, <euchime@yahoo.com>
> >Subject: Re: Simple OSPF Redistribution to RIP
> >Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 09:29:05 -0600
> >
> >It depends on what the mask is on the participating RIP interface
> >connecting to the OSPF ASBR.
> >
> >Is the mask on the RIP interface a /28 also?
> >
> >
> > >>> "tom cheung" <tkc9789@hotmail.com> 01/08/02 08:54AM >>>
> >I'm not sure this'll work. When you redistribute 172.16.1.x from OSPF to
> >RIP, it'll show up as 172.16.0.0 in RIP's routing domain. You'll still be
> >able to reach any 172.16.x.x from downstream rip routers. How about
> >construct an inbound access list on router1's 172.168.x.x LAN interface
>to
> >only allow whatever he wants?
> >
> >
> > >From: "DAN DORTON" <DHSTS68@dhs.state.il.us>
> > >Reply-To: "DAN DORTON" <DHSTS68@dhs.state.il.us>
> > >To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>, <euchime@yahoo.com>
> > >Subject: Re: Simple OSPF Redistribution to RIP
> > >Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 08:22:48 -0600
> > >
> > >Try this.
> > >
> > >access-list 1 permit 172.16.1.27 0.0.0.15
> > >access-list 1 permit 172.16.1.17 0.0.0.15
> > >
> > >route-map ospf2rip permit 10
> > >match ip address 1
> > >
> > >router rip
> > >redistribute ospf 10 metric 2 route-map ospf2rip
> > >
> > >Good luck.
> > >
> > >Dan
> > >
> > >
> > > >>> Elias Udechime <euchime@yahoo.com> 01/08/02 08:00AM >>>
> > >Diagram was messed up. Rip is running only
> > >172.168.x.X. look at it again.
> > >The netmask is /28
> > >
> > >I hope this helps. I have done distribute-list out, it
> > >did not work either. I do understand the problem with
> > >classless and classful. I guess the next trial would
> > >be Route Map.
> > >
> > >Thanks for your chipping in your suggestions.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Topology:
> > > > | | Vlans
> > > > | Rip OSPF
> > > > |
> > >|172.16.1.0-15
> > > > 172.168.x.x LAN|----------Router1------|172.16.1 -31
> > > > |172.16.1.-63
> > > > Also 10.1.1.1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > There are many VLANs. I only want two VLANs to be
> > > > redistributed into RIP.
> > > >
> > > > I have tried access-list, distribute-list and
> > > > redistributed into Rip, this does not work. Could
> > > > some
> > > > shade more light--light.
> > > >
> > > > Sample config:
> > > >
> > > > Router ospf 10
> > > > network 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
> > > > network 10.0.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
> > > >
> > > > Router Rip
> > > > Network 172.168.1.0
> > > > Redistribute OSPF 10 metric 2
> > > > distribute-list 100 in
> > > >
> > > > Access-list 100 permit IP 172.16.1.27 0.0.0.15 any
> > > > Access-list 100 permit IP 172.16.1.17 0.0.0.15 any
> > > >
> > > > These are only two IP in two different VLANs I want
> > > > to
> > > > redistribute into RIP environment.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Elias
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:20 GMT-3