RE: distribute list and passive-interface

From: Waters, Kivas (UK72) (Kivas.Waters@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 08 2002 - 06:19:05 GMT-3

• Next message: Menga, Justin: "RE: DHCP Relay Actions"
• Previous message: Richard Geiger: "wred - I'm a few hours from the test"
• Maybe in reply to: steven: "distribute list and passive-interface"
• Next in thread: Stephen C. Feldberg: "Re: distribute list and passive-interface"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
The end result will be the same when configuring IGRP or RIP. As a point of
interrest, if you wanted to configure an OSPF interface as "passive" (ie
equivalent to a RIP or IGRP passive interface) you could use your first
option only.

regards

Ki

-----Original Message-----
From: steven [mailto:adream@163.com]
Sent: 08 January 2002 01:47
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: distribute list and passive-interface

any difference between the following 2 config:

access-list 1 deny all
router igrp 1

......
distribute 1 out ser 0

router igrp 1

passive-interface ser 0

Thanks.

• Next message: Menga, Justin: "RE: DHCP Relay Actions"
• Previous message: Richard Geiger: "wred - I'm a few hours from the test"
• Maybe in reply to: steven: "distribute list and passive-interface"
• Next in thread: Stephen C. Feldberg: "Re: distribute list and passive-interface"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:20 GMT-3