From: VZ (vincentzhang@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Jan 07 2002 - 23:47:03 GMT-3
Yes! Yes!
greatly, your post on Nov 10 solved my problem.
Thanks, VZ
McCallum, Robert wrote:
>VZ look up the archives, specifically round the time of Oct last year. I had
a similar problem and managed to get it working and posted the solution as to w
hat exactly you need to do.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: VZ [mailto:vincentzhang@yahoo.com]
>Sent: 07 January 2002 08:07
>To: tom cheung; bhill@sgdata.com
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: DLSw peer doesn't established with pass-through configured!
>
>
>I will try these options and reply when back.
>
>Thanks,
>
>VZ
>
>tom cheung wrote:
>
>>Maybe you can try the following and see if you've better luck. For
>>passthru, you need fram map dlsw instead of llc2.
>>
>>dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface serialX DLCI# pass-thru
>>!
>>interface serialX
>>encapsulation frame-relay
>>frame-relay map dlsw DLCI# broadcast
>>
>>
>>
>>>From: VZ <vincentzhang@yahoo.com>
>>>Reply-To: VZ <vincentzhang@yahoo.com>
>>>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>>>Subject: DLSw peer doesn't established with pass-through configured!
>>>Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2002 09:59:28 +0800
>>>
>>>Hi all,
>>>
>>>When configuring the dlsw over frame relay session, everything is
>>>perfect until the option " pass-thru" be added on statement of "dlsw
>>>remote-peer xxxx".
>>>
>>>I cannot find the answer even if searched the CCO site.
>>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>
>>>VZ
>>>
>>>
>>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:19 GMT-3