From: Christian C. Aguillo (chris_aguillo@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Jan 06 2002 - 02:34:59 GMT-3
Shiju,
after re checking your statements, I do agree now with John and Tom.
Sorry for the twist.
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Shiju Joseph" <shijuj@cisco.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 3:56 PM
Subject: BGP :: Route-maps
> Hi,
>
> I understand route-maps looks for the next
> statement if it doesn't match the first one.
>
> So, while using as-path lists, and metric, I
> saw many exampls, where they add a second statment
> so that other routes will not get denied.
>
> But what about the following config ?
>
> =======================================
> router bgp 100
> neighbor 152.1.11.2 remote-as 300
> neighbor 152.1.11.2 send-community
> neighbor 152.1.11.2 route-map Com out
> !
> access-list 98 permit 152.1.9.0 0.0.0.255
> !
> route-map Com permit 10
> match ip address 98
> set community no-export
> !
> ========================================
>
> Here, the peer router is adding community to
> 9.0 net and also accepts other routes.
>
> Why the other routes are not getting denied,
> because they doesn't match the route-map statement ?
>
> Is that I am miising some basic concept ! ?
> The question is, is it always required to add a statement
> to permit non-interesting traffic ?
>
> Thanks
> Shiju
######################################################################
Attention:
This e-mail is privileged and confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient please delete the message and notify the sender.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author.
Note:
This email has been virus scanned and cleared. Should you encounter
any virus problems and deem them as our responsibility please notify
us immediately.
######################################################################
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:17 GMT-3