From: Christian C. Aguillo (chris_aguillo@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Jan 05 2002 - 09:49:01 GMT-3
Gary,
I think this should be solved by the route-map set community none.
I am thinking that the route-map logic u have does not match with the one
being advertised from interface "A" as "no-export". Try to make a simple
network advertised as no-export and re-check your route-map logic. Are you
receiving an aggregate and more specific routes from Interface "A" ?
Can you please post the route-map logic and the bgp table for better
understanding of the router you are in concern.
I dunu if there is an issue between 12.1 from othere IOS versions.
HTH and Mabuhay!!!
Chris
----- Original Message -----
From: "garry baker" <fallow46@yahoo.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2002 2:33 PM
Subject: bgp community, can this be done
> Guys,
>
> i am playing with some scenerios with bgp and have
> come up with something that i don't think can be done.
> say you have a router with 3 interfaces a, b, and c.
> on interface a i have a route-map setting the routes
> coming in from that ebgp peer as as no-export, i am
> passing this to an ibgp peer on int b. now i would
> like to pass the routes from int a to an ebgp peer out
> interface c, but the routes are tagged no-export. i
> believe i can't do this all on one router because when
> i go to change the community to none when leaving int
> c it doesn't work. i think it must be an order of
> operations thing where if the routes are tagged
> no-export they done't make it to the route-map on the
> interface to change the community. Do you guys agree
> with this?
>
> Garry
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:16 GMT-3