RE: OT: CCDP

From: Jack W. Williams (jack.w.williams@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Jan 04 2002 - 14:07:19 GMT-3


   
CID exam is nothing like the DCN exam. I would recommend taking the Boson
CID practice exam #1 for a spin to see if you're ready. Being a CCIE
candidate should give you the right grounding, but the CCNP/CCDP tests tend
to frame their questions a certain way.

HTH
Jack

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
CCIE Lab
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 10:56 PM
To: neiby@ureach.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OT: CCDP

yes, I already took the CCDA yesterday.
there's a lot of design scenarios in it, about 1/4 of
total 72 Q's. by looking at the topics of CCDP CID
test, I was kinda expecting the same thing like DA
test. maybe you're right, I got some other replies
from the list indicating it's a very tough test.
but nevertheless, I'll give it my best shot tomorrow.
I know netbios and windows networking pretty well,
know enough SNA covered in CCIE lab scope, and as you
know, routing and switching, the meat of CCIE lab.
I hope it's like the one you took, with all multiple
choices. I hate poorly-worded questions though.

btw, what is YMMV ?

thanks.

--- John Neiberger <neiby@ureach.com> wrote:
> How well do you know netbios and SNA? Expect a lot
> of
> questions on those topics and windows networking.
> There will
> probably be a lot of routing protocol design
> questions as well
> as a bunch of layer two questions regarding frame
> relay, x.25,
> hdlc, isdn, etc.
>
> This is a tough test and if you pass it without
> studying I'll
> be quite impressed! You'll be taking a newer
> version than I
> did, so YMMV considerably. I'm not sure how much it
> has
> changed since the last version.
>
> You must have taken CCDA already and this isn't like
> that at
> all. The version I had did not have any scenarios
> in it, just
> lots of poorly-worded questions.
>
> Good luck!
> John
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:16 GMT-3