From: Michael C. Popovich (mpopovich@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 03 2002 - 19:29:36 GMT-3
I believe that if you are given a MAC address of a FEP that you assume
it is in non-canonical format and if you are creating a priority list on
the Ethernet side of the DLSW+ cloud you should convert it to canonical.
Please correct me if you find out differently as I am not 100% sure.
Thanks,
MP
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Sasa Milic
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 4:01 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSw, ethernet, sap-priority-list & [non]canonical
Hi,
when using sap-priority-list to prioritize traffic origination
on ethernet and going toward FEP over DLSw cloud, should FEP
mac address be in canonical or non-cannonical format ? Example:
PC --- <ethernet> --- R1 --- DLSw --- R2 --- <token> --- FEP
FEP mac address is 4001.3745.0001.
R1 config:
!
dlsw bridge-group 1 sap-priority 1
!
interface Ethernet0
bridge-group 1
!
sap-priority-list 1 high dmac 4001.3745.0001 or <---
sap-priority-list 1 high dmac 0280.eca2.0080 <---
!
PC should have hard-coded FEP address 0280.eca2.0080, right ?
But what about sap-priority-list ?
Sasa
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:15 GMT-3