From: Chua, Parry (Parry.Chua@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Jan 03 2002 - 03:29:20 GMT-3
Why not remove the virtual-link and do some test and check the result.
Parry Chua
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Popovich [mailto:m.popovich@home.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2002 2:14 PM
To: Manny Gonzalez
Cc: CCIE GROUPSTUDY
Subject: Re: OSPF Virtual-Link
I agree with that assessment.
I do a show ip ospf virtual-link and I see that it is up and the state
is
full.
What I don't understand is if the router that I am terminating the
virtual
link on is also doing an area range summary, then why isn't the ospf
router
that is connected to the backbone by the link not receiving the summary?
MP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Manny Gonzalez" <manny@nyp.org>
To: "Michael Popovich" <m.popovich@home.com>
Cc: "CCIE GROUPSTUDY" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: OSPF Virtual-Link
> Hmmm, I believe you should not, but will see a Virtual relationship...
>
> "sh ip ospf v"
>
> Remember the relationships happen between connected neighbors (or via
a
> fake connection via a tunnel :-))
>
> But then again, what do I know about OSPF? I have only spent about 12
> months on it and I keep finding out that I know diddly about it... :-(
>
> Good luck
>
> Michael Popovich wrote:
> >
> > Should I see a neighbor relationship between the routers connecting
via
> > virtual link?
> >
> > I have never looked at that and I am trying to do an area range
summary
to
> > other ospf routers and the only one not getting the summary is the
router
> > connecting via virtual link. I did a "show ip ospf neighbors" and
only
saw the
> > neighbor relationship of the transit area router.
> >
> > Thanks for any help.
> >
> > Michael
> --
> Manny Gonzalez | manny@nyp.org | n2mav
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:14 GMT-3