From: Annu (annu_roopa@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Jan 01 2002 - 14:48:32 GMT-3
VZ,
What is the scenario u are trying ? may be a diagram
with IP addreses would help in simulating it here at
my end.
good luck,
Annu
--- VZ <vincentzhang@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Kivas,
>
> NO, I really find the difference in treatment of
> internal and external
> OSPF routes in lab environment.
>
> Would you check it?
>
> V
>
> Waters, Kivas (UK72) wrote:
>
> >Hi Vincent, your understanding of the below issue
> is not 100%. Any OSPF
> >routes which are subnetted, internal or external,
> will not be redistributed
> >into a classful IGRP network. The issue here is a
> classful subnet mask
> >issue, OSPF internal routes are not treated any
> differently to OSPf external
> >routes when it comes to redistribution into RIPv1
> or IGRP.
> >
> >1. Is it right result? No.
> >
> >best regards
> >
> >Ki
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: VZ [mailto:vincentzhang@yahoo.com]
> >Sent: 31 December 2001 03:21
> >To:
> >Subject: various OSPF routes redis into IGRP
> >
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> >Considering the situation that a router performs
> OSPF/IGRP redistribution.
> >
> >all OSPF internal routes will be redistributed into
> IGRP even if
> >classful/supernet/subnet mask routes they are.
> >
> >all OSPF external with classful mask will be
> redistributed too.
> >
> >But all OSPF external with supernet/subnet mask
> will NOT be redistributed.
> >
> >My questions,
> >
> >1. Is it right result?
> >2. IS the same result for ospf -> RIP/EIGRP or not?
> >
> >thanks, V
> >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:56:13 GMT-3