From: Jim Brown (Jim.Brown@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Dec 31 2001 - 12:12:22 GMT-3
Since we have identified almost everything else that must match for
adjacencies, why leave out the final items..... Authentication and Area.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sasa Milic [mailto:smilic@EUnet.yu]
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 12:16 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: CCBootcamp Lab 1, ospf hello timer mismatch
Steve,
It takes more than just hello/dead timers. Network mask and stub are flag
also have to be the same. In your case, network masks are different.
Sasa
Steve Barone wrote:
>
> all:
> I cannot establish nieghbor adjacency on r1 and r2, debug shows a
> hello parameter mismatch, a sh ip o int, shows both interface are
> NON__BROADCAST and I am using neighbor statements. Both show hello
> interval =20, but I get the message below: (can ping 100% successful)
>
> R1#:
> I B00:18:26: OSPF: rcv. v:2 t:1 l:44 rid:172.168.32.1
> aid:0.0.0.0 chk:2EC5 aut:0 auk: from Serial0.1
> 00:18:26: OSPF: Rcv hello from 172.168.32.1 area 0 from Serial0.1
> 10.10.1.2
> 00:18:26: OSPF: Mismatched hello parameters from 10.10.1.2
> 00:18:26: OSPF: Dead R 80 C 80, Hello R 20 C 20 Mask R 255.255.0.0 C
> 255.255.255.0
>
> r2#
> 00:23:16: OSPF: rcv. v:2 t:1 l:44 rid:10.10.1.1
> aid:0.0.0.0 chk:E656 aut:0 auk: from Serial0
> 00:23:16: OSPF: Rcv hello from 10.10.1.1 area 0 from Serial0 10.10.1.1
> 00:23:16: OSPF: Mismatched hello parameters from 10.10.1.1
> 00:23:16: OSPF: Dead R 80 C 80, Hello R 20 C 20 Mask R 255.255.255.0
> C 255.255.0.0
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:50 GMT-3