From: kym blair (kymblair@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Dec 24 2001 - 04:21:45 GMT-3
Ki,
This is the best document available on DLSW+ (even better than any books).
Chapter 5 is on DLSW+ queuing. There is a button at the top for PDF if you
prefer. Watch the wraparound:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/tech/tadlt_rg.htm
Kym
>From: "Godwin Pang" <gytpang@jos.com.hk>
>Reply-To: "Godwin Pang" <gytpang@jos.com.hk>
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: RE: Custom queue-list for DLSW
>Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 10:47:45 +0800
>
>Hi Group,
>
>I have seen earily that the "dlsw" keyword is used for SNA traffic. But
>when I check the CD, it said "the dlsw, rsrb, and stun keywords refer only
>to direct encapsulation"
>Is it mean that "dlsw" represent all dlsw traffics in direct encapsulation
>while it represent SNA only in other encapsulation (eg FST)
>
>Thanks,Godwin
>
>
> >>> "Waters, Kivas (UK72)" <Kivas.Waters@Honeywell.com> 12/24 7:03 AM >>>
>Hi Rich, I want to fully understand the use of the "dlsw" keyword when used
>with custom/priority queuing but cannot find any info on CCO to help. Do
>you have any URL's you could point me towards?
>
>many thanks
>
>Ki
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Richard Gallagher [mailto:rgallagh@cisco.com]
>Sent: 12 December 2001 16:13
>To: David Vu; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: Custom queue-list for DLSW
>
>
>David,
>
>"dlsw" keyword is only for FST encapsulation, for TCP you need to specify
>all
>the ports involved.
>
>Rich
>CCIE #7211
>
>On Dec 12, 9:38am, David Vu chatted about:
> > Subject:Custom queue-list for DLSW
> > In bootcamp lab 20, it asks you to do a custom queue with
> >
> > 50% on DLSW
> > 25% on IP
> > 25% on IPX
> >
> > For DLSW, the solution is
> > access-list 101 permit tcp any eq 2065 any
> > access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 2065
> > access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 2067
> > access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 1981
> > access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 1982
> > access-list 101 permit tcp any any eq 1983
> > queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 list 101
> >
> > Would it be easier to do "queue-list 1 protocol dlsw 1" instead of using
>an
> > access-list?
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:47 GMT-3