From: jonatale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu Dec 20 2001 - 04:01:53 GMT-3
i agree, too bad you can't do it with ospf on cisco. did they change this???
Richard Foltz wrote:
> i have always found it good form to hard code router ids when possible, i.e.
> OSPF, and BGP. it provides more stability and certainty within the network
> cuz u always know what the ID is going to be no matter what you do later.
>
> Richard Foltz, CCIE#8339, CCNP-Voice, CCDP, MCSE+I, Network+, A+
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Joseph Ezerski" <jezerski@broadcom.com>
> To: "'Jerry Toomey'" <jetoomey@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 2:39 PM
> Subject: RE: When to reboot a router?
>
> > Given that the CCIE R&S lab will be using IOS 12.1 across the board, when
> it
> > comes to OSPF, why not manually nail down your RIDs under the OSPF
> process.
> > That way you cannot get screwed by the additon of a loopback with better
> > numbers. Is anyone aware of any caveats doing it this way? I'd hate to
> > find out during the lab ;)
> >
> > Ex:
> >
> > router ospf 1
> > router-id 1.1.1.1
> >
> >
> > -Joe
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> > Jerry Toomey
> > Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:33 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: When to reboot a router?
> >
> >
> > Can any of you think of more scenarios that requires rebooting a router:
> >
> > 1. OSPF--if you add a second loopback, then reboot for the new process
> > ID.
> > 2. ATM-- I've heard that sometimes you just have to reboot?
> > 3. ?
> >
> >
> >
> > =====
> > Jerry Toomey of http://www.wansend.com can be reached at 949-439-4685
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:45 GMT-3