From: jonatale@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu Dec 20 2001 - 03:30:49 GMT-3
can you spell "cheerio"
steven.j.nelson@bt.com wrote:
> Lots of work in London ?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sparkest pig [mailto:hsm_p@hotmail.com]
> Sent: 04 December 2001 05:42
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com; jobs@groupstudy.com
> Subject: ~~~ CCIE still needs a job~~~
>
> I am the CCIE that sent the message "~~~CCIE needs job~~~"
>
> thanks for those that send me some link or offer to help. I will response
> to each of you with my resume (but use my another email address). i have
> contact headhunters and ask professional to proof read my resume/cover
> letter two months ago already.
>
> and for the "Mcdonald" jokes, it does not make me feel too bad (hey, imagine
>
> i go through everything that a CCIE supposed to go through and I get laid
> off about a month AFTER I get my CCIE. and I am still out of job and
> probably i m jobless until christmas. compare to this, the "Mcdonald" jokes
>
> is a "stess relief" ;). The reason that I am not willing to work at
> Mcdonald is: i know that my 55% EI (employment insurance) from Canada is
> more than Cdn$8/hr at Mcdonald. Being able to figure out how to pass CCIE
> and complete my M.Eng degree, I am smart enough to know that it is better to
>
> stay home and get my 55% EI pay than working at Mcdonald where I can only
> get 25k a year.
>
> and for those that challenge me for my CCIE number, I also will reply
> separately with my CCIE number, my real name, when and where did I get my
> CCIE. I did not post it in my original post because I don't enjoy my number
> plus my name floating around (there is nothing wrong with that. it is just
> personal perference).
>
> and i apologize that i send this email to the study list too. sorry.
>
> once again, thanks. this list is very encouraging because everytime when i
> receive someone that offer help to me, I feel that there is still hope.
>
> and please don't flame anymore. i m sure that many of us would not want to
> see flame.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:45 GMT-3