From: Larson, Chris (Contractor) (Chris.Larson@xxxxxx)
Date: Tue Dec 18 2001 - 17:05:10 GMT-3
Well, gee I guess you could have just done that in the first place.
However, the reason I say it is used to summarize is because you can simply
say
area-address 00
and it will include all IPX networks that are defined using nslp enable on
the interface. Therefore the area-address command is really used to
sumarrize those address on NLSP enabled interfaces. Therefore what other
purpose would area-address serve if you simply enable NLSP or define NLSP by
using nlsp enable under the interface. Area-address is used to SUMMARIZE.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Brown [mailto:Jim.Brown@CaseLogic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 2:48 PM
To: 'Larson, Chris (Contractor)'; Jim Brown; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: What the heck is the NLSP area-address command for?
xtocid148655BM_28482BM_1018265Directly from the Doc CD
BM_27290area-address
To define a set of network numbers to be part of the current NetWare
Link-Services Protocol (NLSP) area, use the area-address command in router
configuration mode. To remove a set of network numbers from the current NLSP
area, use the no form of this command.BM_1018267
-----Original Message-----
From: Larson, Chris (Contractor) [mailto:Chris.Larson@ed.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:50 AM
To: 'Jim Brown'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: What the heck is the NLSP area-address command for?
I believe it is really just a tool for aggregating or summarizing NLSP
networks, not defining them.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Brown [ mailto:Jim.Brown@CaseLogic.com
<mailto:Jim.Brown@CaseLogic.com> ]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:29 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: What the heck is the NLSP area-address command for?
Running thought some testing the other night and I defined a network between
two routers, network 22. The router had a couple of other networks off other
interfaces involved in IPX RIP processes.
I then added the area-address command to define an exact match, area-address
22 FFFFFFFF.
Guess what, the 22 network appeared as an N route but so did all of the
other attached interfaces that were different networks?
What the heck is going on? I thought the area-address command defined which
networks were part of the routing process like OSPF?
Can anyone help me?
<http://www.groupstudy.com/list/posting.html>
To unsubscribe from the CCIELAB list, send a message to
majordomo@groupstudy.com with the body containing:
unsubscribe ccielab
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:44 GMT-3