From: Mas Kato (loomis_towcar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Dec 11 2001 - 05:05:18 GMT-3
[demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text]
The "does not have SRB hosts" part of the objective could be a red herring. Tho
ugh your token ring hosts may not be generating RIFs, you still need to conside
r what the frames look like at layer-2 on the two different media and ask yours
elf if the frames are going to be compatible "as is" or will they need to be "t
ranslated" in some way.
Hint: The "SR" in SR/TLB doesn't necessarily mean "source route bridging" (SRB,
with RIFs) only. It could also apply to "source route transparent bridging" (S
RT, no RIFs).
Hope this helps,
Mas Kato
https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> "kyle prevey" <preveyk@hotmail.com> ccielab@groupstudy.com Translational Brid
ging and SR/TLB !HELP!Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 06:58:59
>Reply-To: "kyle prevey" <preveyk@hotmail.com>
>
>In my practice lab scenario the token segment does not have SRB hosts so I
>don't setup SR/TLB, is that correct? Will the folling config allow hosts on
>the ethernet segment to be bridged and able to talk with hosts on the token?
>Or does this have to be done another way? Is this translational bridging but
>not SR/TLB?
>
>no ip routing
>!
>int e0
>no ip add
>bridge-group 1
>!
>int to0
>no ip add
>ring 16
>bridg-group 1
>!
>bridge 1 protocol ieee
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:41 GMT-3