From: Robert DuBell (bobdu11@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Dec 08 2001 - 11:46:07 GMT-3
Got it thanks to John.....When I summarized my 172.168.x.x and 150.10.x.x
routes for redistribution purposes into IGRP, I didn't put my mask
information in the summary-address information and it defaulted to a 0.0.0.0
summary which prevented my IGRP routes from being
redistrubuted...Thanks.....Bob
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert DuBell" <bobdu11@home.com>
To: "'thegroup'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 08, 2001 2:16 PM
Subject: ROUTE REDISTRIBUTION
> OK, here's the problem, I've got redistribution happening between IGRP and
> OSPF. Redistributing into IGRP from OSPF is working fine. Redistributing
> into OSPF from IGRP isn't happening for some reason. here's my configs
> running IOS Version
>
> IOS (tm) 2500 Software (C2500-INS-L), Version 12.0(17), RELEASE SOFTWARE
> (fc1
>
> R3
>
> router ospf 64
> area 0 authentication message-digest
> area 1 virtual-link 172.168.10.2
> summary-address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
> redistribute igrp 1 metric 100 subnets
> network 150.10.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 2
> network 172.168.20.0 0.0.0.255 area 1
> !
> router igrp 1
> redistribute ospf 64 metric 64 10 255 5 1500
> network 160.10.0.0
>
> I 140.10.0.0/16 [100/8976] via 160.10.1.2, 00:00:14, Serial1
> I 140.11.0.0/16 [100/8976] via 160.10.1.2, 00:00:15, Serial1
> 172.168.0.0/24 is subnetted, 6 subnets
> O 172.168.10.0 [110/128] via 172.168.20.1, 00:16:13, Serial0
> C 172.168.20.0 is directly connected, Serial0
> O E2 172.168.100.0 [110/90] via 172.168.20.1, 00:16:03, Serial0
> O E2 172.168.200.0 [110/90] via 172.168.20.1, 00:16:03, Serial0
> O E2 172.168.201.0 [110/90] via 172.168.20.1, 00:16:03, Serial0
> O E2 172.168.202.0 [110/90] via 172.168.20.1, 00:16:03, Serial0
> C 160.10.0.0/16 is directly connected, Serial1
> 150.10.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> C 150.10.1.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0
> O* 0.0.0.0/0 is a summary, 00:09:52, Null0
>
> R2 (supposed to be receiving redistributed routes from IGRP) but they are
> not showing up upstream into the OSPF Process
>
> ateway of last resort is not set
>
> 172.168.0.0/24 is subnetted, 6 subnets
> C 172.168.10.0 is directly connected, Serial1
> C 172.168.20.0 is directly connected, Serial0
> O E2 172.168.100.0 [110/90] via 172.168.10.1, 00:17:01, Serial1
> O E2 172.168.200.0 [110/90] via 172.168.10.1, 00:17:01, Serial1
> O E2 172.168.201.0 [110/90] via 172.168.10.1, 00:17:01, Serial1
> O E2 172.168.202.0 [110/90] via 172.168.10.1, 00:17:01, Serial1
> 150.10.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> O IA 150.10.1.0 [110/74] via 172.168.20.2, 00:17:01, Serial0
>
>
> R4 (is receiving OSPF routes being redistrubed into IGRP) working fine !
>
> R4#show ip route
> Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
> D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
> N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
> E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
> i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, * - candidate
> default
> U - per-user static route, o - ODR
>
> Gateway of last resort is not set
>
> C 140.10.0.0/16 is directly connected, Loopback0
> C 140.11.0.0/16 is directly connected, Loopback1
> I 172.168.0.0/16 [100/10476] via 160.10.1.1, 00:00:05, Serial1
> C 160.10.0.0/16 is directly connected, Serial1
> I 150.10.0.0/16 [100/8576] via 160.10.1.1, 00:00:05, Serial1
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:40 GMT-3