From: Reisner, Tim (TR126568@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Dec 07 2001 - 15:54:27 GMT-3
It is alittle more than that.
The three address all have a different first octet. 140 141 and 142
This wasn't taken into consideration in any of the responses.
The simplest way to handle it maybe to specify the 3 address seperately.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Wade Edwards [mailto:wade.edwards@powerupnetworks.com]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 12:33 PM
To: Courtney Alexander Foster; David; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Filtering & Wildcard
Actually it should be:
access-list 1 deny 140.0.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 1 permit 140.0.0.0 0.3.255.255
He only wanted 1, 2 and 3.
L8r.
-----Original Message-----
From: Courtney Alexander Foster [mailto:cfoster@cnr.edu]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 11:44 AM
To: David; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Filtering & Wildcard
140.0.0.0 0.3.255.255
-----Original Message-----
From: David
Sent: Fri 12/7/2001 12:04 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Cc:
Subject: Filtering & Wildcard
Guys
If u are asked to allow say 3 routes (140.1.0.0,
141.2.0.0 & 142.3.0.0) in to your rack from a
backbone. What type of wildcard would you use in ur
ACL. Would the following be the best?
access-list 1 permit 140.1.0.0 0.0.0.0
access-list 1 permit 141.2.0.0 0.0.0.0
access-list 1 permit 142.3.0.0 0.0.0.0
OR:
access-list 1 permit 140.1.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 1 permit 141.2.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 1 permit 142.3.0.0 0.0.255.255
?
Thanks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:40 GMT-3