Re: BGP community no-export vs local-AS

From: Charles Huang (CharlesNY2000@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2001 - 15:20:01 GMT-3

• Next message: Harrison, David: "RE: Making IPX RIP passive on certain interfaces"
• Previous message: j killion: "Re: Redistributing into EIGRP without metric"
• Maybe in reply to: Neil Garcia Legada: "BGP community no-export vs local-AS"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
prefix with local-AS community tagged will NOT advertise to other AS within the
 confderation while
prefix with no-export community tagged will.

I vertified this on my home lab before. you can try it too.

just my 2 cents

Charles

----- Original Message -----
From: "Neil Garcia Legada" <nlegs@visto.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2001 4:07 AM
Subject: BGP community no-export vs local-AS

> Hi Group,
>
> Couldn't find any differences in their application. Anybody does ???
>
> Appreciate any response.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Neil
>
>

• Next message: Harrison, David: "RE: Making IPX RIP passive on certain interfaces"
• Previous message: j killion: "Re: Redistributing into EIGRP without metric"
• Maybe in reply to: Neil Garcia Legada: "BGP community no-export vs local-AS"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:39 GMT-3