From: Liu Jianxin-qch1927 (Jianxin.Liu@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Dec 04 2001 - 23:32:22 GMT-3
Thanks all,
Here is the configuration for R1
router eigrp 100
redistribute ospf 1
network 199.5.211.0
default-metric 100 100 255 1 1500
!
router ospf 1
network 199.5.211.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
Here is the configuration for R2
router eigrp 100
network 199.5.211.0
!
router ospf 1
network 133.5.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
network 199.5.211.7 0.0.0.0 area 0
Please notes that both R1 and R2 run OSPF and eigrp. But I only redistribute os
pf into eigrp on R1.
And I have default metric in eigrp for redistribution.
I think maybe I also need redistribute ospf to eigrp on R2. But my questions is
: Must I do so to solve the problem?
Thanks,
Jianxin
-----Original Message-----
From: SFeldberg@edeltacom.com [mailto:SFeldberg@edeltacom.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 4:26 AM
To: Mas Kato
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com; nobody@groupstudy.com; Jianxin.Liu
Subject: Re: why no FD in eigrp
I was thinking that too at first. I perceived that value as the metric to
reach the advertising host (199.5.211.8), who's network was included in the
EIGRP routing process. Jianxin - let's see some configs.
Steve
sfeldberg@edeltacom.com
"Mas Kato"
<loomis_towcar@speed To: sfeldberg@edeltacom.com
racer.com> cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent by: Subject: Re: why no FD in ei
grp
nobody@groupstudy.co
m
12/04/2001 03:16 PM
Please respond to
"Mas Kato"
[demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text]
Steve,
You're probably right, but I can't help but wonder how EIGRP is calculating
the first term in: (25651200/25625600), which is supposed to be the (total
cost to the advertised route/cost to the neighbor advertising the route)...
Regards,
Mas Kato
https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
> SFeldberg@edeltacom.com Re: why no FD in eigrp Liu Jianxin-qch1927
<Jianxin.Liu@invisix.com>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com, nobody@groupstudy.com
>Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 13:40:11 -0500
>Reply-To: SFeldberg@edeltacom.com
>
>No way for EIGRP to calculate a metric for the OSPF routes. No metric =
>infinity = inaccessible. Remember that IGRP/EIGRP require the application
>of 5 metric values during redistribution, or to have a default-metric
>applied to the routing process in config-router mode.
>
>Steve
>
>
>
> Liu
> Jianxin-qch1927 To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> <Jianxin.Liu@in cc:
> visix.com> Subject: why no FD in eigrp
>
>
>
>
>Group,
>
>I use a simple topology as follow:
>
> R1 R2
> | |
>------------------------- LAN
>|
>R3
>
>
>R1 and R2, R3 run OSPF on their ethernet interface.
>
>R1 and R2 also run eigrp on the Etherent interface.
>
>Then I redistribute OSPF into eigrp on R1 and hope to see these routes on
>R2's routing table.
>But I only saw the OSPF route on R2.
>
>R2#show ip route
>O IA 10.32.4.32/27 [110/11] via 199.5.211.60, 00:06:21, Ethernet0
>O IA 10.32.5.32/27 [110/12] via 199.5.211.50, 00:06:21, Ethernet0
> [110/12] via 199.5.211.51, 00:06:21, Ethernet0
>
>
>R2#show ip eigrp top
>P 10.32.4.32/27, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible
> via 199.5.211.8 (25651200/25625600), Ethernet0
>P 10.32.5.32/27, 0 successors, FD is Inaccessible
> via 199.5.211.8 (25651200/25625600), Ethernet0
>
>Notes the FD in the eigrp is inaccessible here. So I think this is the
>reason why the eigrp route can
>not insert into the routing table. But I do not know why FD inaccessible?
>
>Can anyone help?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jianxin
------------------------------------------------------------
Speed Racer's Official Virtual Pit Stop.
http://www.speedracerdsl.com/speedracer/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 13 2002 - 10:32:37 GMT-3