From: Duy Nguyen (net_port@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Nov 29 2001 - 12:22:50 GMT-3
Excellent point.
Absolutely Positively Continuously Sincerely,
Duy Nguyen CCNP
net_port@hotmail.com
Cell (817) 707-7451
>From: Jim Brown <Jim.Brown@CaseLogic.com>
>Reply-To: Jim Brown <Jim.Brown@CaseLogic.com>
>To: "'Lopez, James'" <james.lopez@atosorigin.com>, "'McCallum,
>Robert'" <Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com>, "'Ccielab' (E-mail)"
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>, "Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail)"
><cisco@groupstudy.com>, a bratchell <a.bratchell@caeuk.com>,
>graham <graham@apollo7.fsbusiness.co.uk>, john bermingham
><john.bermigham4@virgin.net>, jolash <jolashwood@energis.co.uk>,
>kash <kash@dataplex.co.uk>, martin <martin.duggan@ntl.com>, nigel
><nigel.p.o'brien@ird.eds.com>, paul frost <paul.frost@refeq.com>,
> peter norberg <peter.norberg@dimensiondata.se>, phil
><phil@thepooltable.co.uk>
>Subject: RE: Split Horizon and Frame
>Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 08:04:56 -0700
>
>The real kicker is you must disable EIGRP split horizon on the interface of
>an NBMA network. If you disable it on the interface this will not work. You
>must use the no ipx split-horizon EIGRP <process ID> command. The no ipx
>split horizon command doesn't mean squat to EIGRP.
>
>In an NBMA network, you should use EIGRP or create tunnels for RIP. Without
>the ability to disable split-horizon for RIP you will never pass all the
>routing information out to the spokes.
>
>Of course all the rule about subinterfaces and such apply to split horizon.
>Just keep the NBMA thing in mind when using physical or multipoint
>interfaces.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Lopez, James [mailto:james.lopez@atosorigin.com]
>Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 7:36 AM
>To: 'McCallum, Robert'; 'Ccielab' (E-mail); Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail);
>a bratchell; graham; john bermingham; jolash; kash; martin; nigel; paul
>frost; peter norberg; phil
>Subject: RE: Split Horizon and Frame
>
>
>Robert,
>
>For IPX RIP, it is my understanding that you can not turn off split
>horizon.
>
>For IP on frame interfaces, split horizon is turned on automatically for
>point to point interfaces but off by default for the physical and
>multi-point interfaces.
>
>some one please correct me if I am incorrect.
>
>
>JL
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com]
>Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 8:03 AM
>To: 'Ccielab' (E-mail); Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail); a bratchell;
>graham;
>john bermingham; jolash; kash; martin; nigel; paul frost; peter norberg;
>phil
>Subject: Split Horizon and Frame
>
>
>Folks,
>
>Quick question just to make sure I have things correct in my head. Please
>correct me if I'm wrong.
>
>O.k.
>
>FOR IPX every frame interface (physical, point, multipoint) split horizon
>is
>enabled by default.
>
>FOR IP physical frame interface split horizon is disabled and for point and
>multipoint split horizon is enabled by default.
>
>The above on ATM interfaces is it the same rules??
>
>Cheers
>
>Robert McCallum
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:25 GMT-3