From: Hansang Bae (hbae@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Nov 27 2001 - 20:16:36 GMT-3
At 07:38 AM 11/28/2001 +1100, Albert Lu wrote:
>[snip]
> From my experience, it's best to use distribute-list for DV protocols and
>route-maps for LS protocols. What about the distribute-list 10 out ospf 10
>command, where you are applying the distribute-list to the routing protocol
>being redistributed in, would that be the same as using a route-map?
I've always been partial to RMs because to me they are more flexible. But
it's a personal choice. What you guys can practice is creating a RM that's
*THE* most efficient. Don't create a route-map that uses two access-lists
when it can be done with just one. You'll need to practice some 'not
logic' but it's doable.
hsb
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:24 GMT-3