From: Mas Kato (loomis_towcar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Nov 27 2001 - 06:01:22 GMT-3
[demime could not interpret encoding binary - treating as plain text]
Wayne,
I can't answer your question directly, but I can assure you that the lab will t
est how precisely you can control how your stack is behaving as a system.
My humble advice would be to try not to let situations that "sometimes work, so
metimes don't" slip by. If you absolutely want to eliminate any possibility of
route feedback, make your mutual redistibutions "airtight" with filtering. Sure
, it may not be necessary for a given situation, but why take a chance on getti
ng bit if the requirements change down the road? If the requirements change, yo
u'll -know- whether you need to change your configs because you are in precise
control of what is going on.
There won't be any time to ponder hypothetical situations--try to avoid reading
anything into the questions. You won't get any credit for providing functional
ity they didn't ask for.
Regards,
Mas
> "Wayne Lewis" <lewisway@hcc.hawaii.edu> <ccielab@groupstudy.com> flsm to vlsm
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:23:26 -1000
>Reply-To: "Wayne Lewis" <lewisway@hcc.hawaii.edu>
>
> When redistributing IGRP to OSPF, is it acceptable to only redistribute t
he
>precise IGRP routes via a route map on the lab exam? Or is the
>redistribution supposed to be dynamic enough that it would allow more IGRP
>routes to be redistributed should (hypothetically, but not really) other
>IGRP routes be added later?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Wayne
Mas Kato
https://ecardfile.com/id/mkato
------------------------------------------------------------
Speed Racer's Official Virtual Pit Stop.
http://www.speedracerdsl.com/speedracer/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:23 GMT-3