Connected Routes Redistribution

From: Neil Garcia Legada (nlegs@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Nov 27 2001 - 05:06:12 GMT-3

• Next message: Chua, Parry: "RE: flsm to vlsm"
• Previous message: Wayne Lewis: "RE: flsm to vlsm"
• Next in thread: Hansang Bae: "Re: Connected Routes Redistribution"
• Maybe reply: Hansang Bae: "Re: Connected Routes Redistribution"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hi Group,

What is the recommended or proper way to redistribute connected routes using a
route map ??? Using an ACL matching the specific network IP address on the inte
rface or just a plain 'match interface <int>' ??? Most of the samples I saw wou
ld use the previous. All the while I was using the latter, saves me an ACL.

Don't seem to have any differences in terms of end result. Something I'm not aw
are of ???

Just want to solicit some opinions out there.

Thanks,
Neil

• Next message: Chua, Parry: "RE: flsm to vlsm"
• Previous message: Wayne Lewis: "RE: flsm to vlsm"
• Next in thread: Hansang Bae: "Re: Connected Routes Redistribution"
• Maybe reply: Hansang Bae: "Re: Connected Routes Redistribution"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:23 GMT-3