From: Chua, Parry (Parry.Chua@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Nov 26 2001 - 00:44:30 GMT-3
Hi,
>It's just that I'm working on a scenario that has a fully meshed PVC
frame
>relay cloud, and the requirements specified to not use subinterfaces at
all,
>and only use the 'frame-relay map' statement at the hub.
In your case, the hub and spoke are all has multiple dlci's, right ?
So there are any combination of connection, now it is depend on the
physical
interface where is the other end which it connected to. The best
approach is to disable the inverse arp this these situation and then
using frame-relay map to reach the destination. This take care of
unwanted dynamic map and unwanted destination.
Parry Chua
-----Original Message-----
From: Albert Lu [mailto:albert_ccie@yahoo.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2001 7:08 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Frame Relay Main Interface using 'frame-relay interface-dlci'
Hello Group,
I would like to get something cleared up. Is there any point in using
the
'frame-relay interface-dlci' command on a major interface for the
spokes,
where the frame switch has fully meshed PVCs? Lets say you have 3 DLCIs
available for the port, and you specified a frame-relay interface-dlci
for
only 1 DLCI. The other DLCIs will be picked up anyway by the major
interface
anyway, so using the 'frame-relay interface-dlci' command is pretty
useless.
You can't turn off inverse-arp, because you need that to work with the
'frame-relay interface-dlci' command.
The proper way of doing it would be to use it on a subinterface,
specifying
the 'frame-relay interface-dlci' will pick up only 1 dlci for
point-to-point, and more than 1(if specified) for multipoint.
It's just that I'm working on a scenario that has a fully meshed PVC
frame
relay cloud, and the requirements specified to not use subinterfaces at
all,
and only use the 'frame-relay map' statement at the hub.
Please confirm my knowledge
Thanks
Albert
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:22 GMT-3