From: Duy Nguyen (net_port@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Nov 25 2001 - 17:28:31 GMT-3
You're are correct.
Absolutely Positively Continuously Sincerely,
Duy Nguyen CCNP
net_port@hotmail.com
Cell (817) 707-7451
>From: "Albert Lu" <albert_ccie@yahoo.com>
>Reply-To: "Albert Lu" <albert_ccie@yahoo.com>
>To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Frame Relay Main Interface using 'frame-relay interface-dlci'
>Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 22:07:57 +1100
>
>Hello Group,
>
>I would like to get something cleared up. Is there any point in using the
>'frame-relay interface-dlci' command on a major interface for the spokes,
>where the frame switch has fully meshed PVCs? Lets say you have 3 DLCIs
>available for the port, and you specified a frame-relay interface-dlci for
>only 1 DLCI. The other DLCIs will be picked up anyway by the major
>interface
>anyway, so using the 'frame-relay interface-dlci' command is pretty
>useless.
>You can't turn off inverse-arp, because you need that to work with the
>'frame-relay interface-dlci' command.
>
>The proper way of doing it would be to use it on a subinterface, specifying
>the 'frame-relay interface-dlci' will pick up only 1 dlci for
>point-to-point, and more than 1(if specified) for multipoint.
>
>It's just that I'm working on a scenario that has a fully meshed PVC frame
>relay cloud, and the requirements specified to not use subinterfaces at
>all,
>and only use the 'frame-relay map' statement at the hub.
>
>Please confirm my knowledge
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Albert
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:22 GMT-3