From: Phil (ciscostudent1@xxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Wed Nov 21 2001 - 08:34:56 GMT-3
The correct thing to do is ALWAYS make the bandwidth reflect whatever the cloc
krate is in that interface.
Phil.
Albert Lu <albert_ccie@yahoo.com> escreveu: On the otherhand, it seems like s
erial links always default to a T1
1.544Mbps for routing protocol cost calculations.
Another question that has been in the back of my mind is that when should
the bandwidth statement be entered into the interface? From various labs
(eg. fatkid), and sources they say that it is a good idea to always include
the bandwidth statement for all WAN interfaces (FR, Ser, BRI, ATM). But if
there were no specifications for what bandwidth to put on the interfaces,
then what can you do?
I guess if the bandwidth statement was left off, then they would default to
T1 and that should be ok.
Albert
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Duy Nguyen
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 2:02 PM
To: Charles.Conte@NASD.com
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Simple Question on serial interfaces.
whatever you assign the clockrate, that's your total bandwidth. Try to do
tftp w/ 128k than try w/ 2048k you will see the difference. clockrate=bw.
Absolutely Positively Continuously Sincerely,
Duy Nguyen CCNP/CCIE written
net_port@hotmail.com
Cell (817) 707-7451
>From: "Conte, Charles"
>Reply-To: "Conte, Charles"
>To: "'ccielab@groupstudy.com'"
>Subject: Simple Question on serial interfaces.
>Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 20:31:14 -0500
>
>All,
>
> I have a real stupid question. Anyways to find out what the serial
>interface clockrate what do I have to do. Can I assume that whatever it
>assigns as BW is what the clockrate is set at. I don't think this is true
>because I configured my IGX to run on the clockrate of 2048. Maybe I
>missed
>it when I did the show controller command or show int serial command, but
>help me out guys.
>
>Charles
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:20 GMT-3