From: Bryan Ginman (ginmanb@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Nov 16 2001 - 16:51:34 GMT-3
it seems that No peer neighbor-route wins :o)
Thanks for all who responded, That was a new one for me.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Andy Cuberly
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 1:13 PM
To: tom cheung; ginmanb@westnet.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Dialer OSPF keeping the line quiet
Try "no peer neighbor-route" on both sides of the ISDN connection.
Andy Cuberly
CCIE #8386
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
tom cheung
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 9:16 AM
To: ginmanb@westnet.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Dialer OSPF keeping the line quiet
The problem is most likely due to route feedback as a result of
redistribution. Try removing redistribution and see if ISDN will stay
quiet, then perform redistribution again but use access or route-map to
prevent feedback.
HTH
Tom
>From: Bryan Ginman <ginmanb@westnet.com>
>Reply-To: Bryan Ginman <ginmanb@westnet.com>
>To: CCIE <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Subject: Dialer OSPF keeping the line quiet
>Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 11:43:44 -0500
>
>Question for the dialer experts out there. I'm doing CCBootcamp lab 17
>dialer section with DDR OSPF demand with callback. Here is a quick
>topology:
>
> r6---isdn/ospf,area5----r5--frame/isis--r14---ospf/area10---r6
>
>isdn ip's
>r5 10.1.35.5 /30
>r6 10.1.35.6 /30
>
>This is just a snapshot of the full topology but there area that is causing
>me problems. on R14 there is mutual redistribution between isis and ospf. I
>have set up ospf demand circuit between r5 r6 etc, I cannot keep the line
>quiet though because I keep getting 10.1.35.5 /32 added to r6 when the line
>goes down causing the line to come back up. I set up a distribution list in
>to deny either /32 address from both sides entering so that it does not get
>added to the routing table. I had also tried putting ip ospf net p-p on the
>interface that didn't work either. Any ideas
>
>Thanks,
>
>Bryan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:17 GMT-3