RE: [BGP Confederations Fully Meshed Peers ?]

From: stephen.paynter@xxxxxx
Date: Tue Nov 13 2001 - 12:45:13 GMT-3

• Next message: SFeldberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: "RE: BGP routes when it is learned from OSPF! - A valid conclusion?"
• Previous message: Brad Ellis: "Re: what are the device required for CCIE(security)!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Each sub-as must adhere to the standard IBGP ruleset such as full-mesh or
route reflection
>
steve

> I have a question regarding BGP confederations. Do the peers need to be
> fully meshed? I looked up at cisco, but i couldn't find anything.
>
> thanks, dave
>
>
> ---tick---tick---tick---only 2 days to the lab---
>
> David Bader / Systems Engineer / NOS
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> ECON!S AG / eBusiness Solutions
> - Electronic Business Solutions
> - Network and Office Solutions
> - Consulting and Projectmanagement
> Neumattstrasse 7 / CH 8953 Dietikon / Switzerland
> Phone ++41 (0) 1 744 73 73
> Direct ++41 (0) 1 744 73 25
> Fax ++ 41 (0) 1 744 73 99
> <mailto:david.bader@econis.com>
> <http://www.econis.com/>

----------
curtiscall@usa.net
OSPF/BGP Practice Exams
www.boson.com\tests\Advanced.htm

[GroupStudy.com removed an attachment of type application/octet-stream which ha
d a name of Paynter,S,Stephen,IVNH31 C.vcf]

• Next message: SFeldberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx: "RE: BGP routes when it is learned from OSPF! - A valid conclusion?"
• Previous message: Brad Ellis: "Re: what are the device required for CCIE(security)!"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:14 GMT-3