From: Waters, Kivas (UK72) (Kivas.Waters@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Nov 12 2001 - 07:06:22 GMT-3
My understanding of it is:
The FR INARP feature automatically assumes discovered DLCI's to apply to
major interfaces and not subinterfaces. This nature can be changed by
configuring the "frame-relay interface-dlci X" command on a subinterface.
Considering the above, lets say that you had a major interface (S0) which
was associated with DLCI 201 and 202. You also configured a S0.1
subinterface with DLCI 101.
By applying the "frame-relay class" to the major interface (S0) you're
saying, traffic shape all the DLCI's associated to the major interface with
the specified class.
By applying the "class XXX" to the DLCI's you're saying, traffic shape the
specific DLCI with the specified class. This is important because unless
you specify a DLCI to be associated with a subinterface, the FR INARP
feature will try to associate the discovered DLCI with the major interface.
Applying the "class XXX" to a DLCI means that you can traffic shape DLCI's
associated with a subinterface.
I believe that although the command is possible as you have shown in your
configs, you have used it in the wrong context.
Hope this helps, for more consult Caslow's book.
Ki
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Huang [mailto:CharlesNY2000@Yahoo.Com]
Sent: 11 November 2001 23:59
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Difference in Frame-Relay map-class
I noticed that you can put frame-relay map-class under the sub-interface or
under the DLCI
does anybody know the difference between the two ???? are there other ways
to
put the map-class ??
interface Serial0/0.24 point-to-point
ip address 10.0.24.2 255.255.255.0
frame-relay class QOS
frame-relay interface-dlci 102
class QOS
Any help will be appricated
Thanks
Charles
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:13 GMT-3