From: fred couples (r0uterj0ckey@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Nov 10 2001 - 23:37:15 GMT-3
There seemed to be a disagreement on using ip rip
neighbor statements and blocking broadcasts so I tried
it out myself. Here's the results:
- rip v1 and no neighbor statement: sent to
255.255.255.255
- rip v1 and neighbor statement: sent to
255.255.255.255 and unicast to the neighbor also
- rip v1 and neighbor and passive-interface: no worky
(technical term of the day)
- rip v2 and no neighbor: sent to 224.0.0.9
- rip v2 and neighbor: sent to 224.0.0.9 and unicast
to neighbor
- rip v2 and neighbor and passive-interface: no worky
so if the requirement is to turn off ipx traffic being
broadcast out you need to use ripv2, which uses
multicast, not broadcast.
Fred
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:12 GMT-3