From: Waters, Kivas (UK72) (Kivas.Waters@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Nov 09 2001 - 21:35:41 GMT-3
Hi Robert, mine worked, here are the configs trimmed down to the important
bits. Sounds like you might have an IOS issue.
regards
Ki
Berkshire
Rack2R6#sh dlsw peer
Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP
uptime
IF Se2/1 100 DISCONN 0 0 conf 0 - -
-
Total number of connected peers: 0
Total number of connections: 0
Rack2R6#
*Nov 10 00:17:18: %DLSWP-3-PLFCHANGE: WAN media mtu maximum is 516; lowering
peer lf
Rack2R6#
Rack2R6#sh dlsw peer
Peers: state pkts_rx pkts_tx type drops ckts TCP
uptime
IF Se2/1 100 CONNECT 2 2 conf 0 - -
00:00:07
Total number of connected peers: 1
Total number of connections: 1
Rack2R6#wr t ...
version 12.1
service timestamps debug datetime localtime
service timestamps log datetime localtime
!
hostname Rack2R6
!
ip subnet-zero
no ip domain-lookup
!
cns event-service server
!
source-bridge ring-group 100
dlsw local-peer
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial2/1 100 pass-thru
!
interface Serial2/1
bandwidth 64
ip address 1.1.1.6 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
frame-relay map dlsw 100 broadcast
!
interface TokenRing5/0
no ip address
ring-speed 16
multiring all
source-bridge 10 1 100
source-bridge spanning
Rack2R3#wr t ...
version 11.2
service timestamps debug datetime localtime
service timestamps log datetime localtime
!
hostname Rack2R3
!
dlsw local-peer
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial2 100 pass-thru
dlsw bridge-group 1
!
interface Ethernet0
no ip address
bridge-group 1
!
interface Serial2
ip address 1.1.1.3 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay
bandwidth 64
frame-relay map dlsw 100 broadcast
!
bridge 1 protocol ieee
-------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: McCallum, Robert [mailto:Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com]
Sent: 09 November 2001 20:21
To: 'Lionel Florit'; Andrew Lennon
Cc: McCallum, Robert; 'fwells12'; ''Ccielab' (E-mail)';
'Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: dlsw pass-thru
Fellow members,
I am now going to have a break from the exhaustive studying I have done in
the last 3 weeks for 2 hours. If anyone comes up with a suggestion I will
try it and get back with the answer in around 2.5 hours. Around 22:30
scottish time.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lionel Florit [mailto:lflorit@cisco.com]
Sent: 09 November 2001 19:48
To: Andrew Lennon
Cc: 'McCallum, Robert'; 'fwells12'; ''Ccielab' (E-mail)';
'Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: dlsw pass-thru
Have you tried to specify the frame size (lf) ? I had to do that last time
I configured it...
Lionel
At 07:20 PM 11/9/2001 +0000, Andrew Lennon wrote:
>All,
>
>Have you worked through
>http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/697/dlswts1.html . I used it for a
>problem when dlsw circuits wouldn't connect, through using the site and
>a few brain cells, I found my answer.
>
>Regs,
>
>Andy
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>McCallum, Robert
>Sent: 09 November 2001 18:13
>To: 'fwells12'; McCallum, Robert; 'Ccielab' (E-mail); Cisco@Groupstudy.
>Com (E-mail)
>Subject: RE: dlsw pass-thru
>
>Thanks everyone for your comments unfortunately however none of them fix
>the problem.
>
>Frank I took of the frame llc2 statements with no joy.
>Chris Larson I took of the border statements with no joy.
>Eddie I already had those map statements in.
>Tom whether it is from or to token ring doesn't matter. The problem is
>the peers won't come up.
>Chris Stephenson I tried to use it on point-to-point links but still
>with no joy.
>
>As I said at the start of the message thanks for your feedback. Unless
>there is someone out there who has done this and knows the answer to
>this I hope to hell that this isn't in the lab exam.
>
>Just in case there are any proctors reading this my name isn't really
>Robert McCallum
>
>(just in case they say "hee hee hee lets give him the lab with the
>pass-thru option in it" )
>
>Any other takers
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: fwells12 [mailto:fwells12@hotmail.com]
>Sent: 09 November 2001 16:39
>To: McCallum, Robert; 'Ccielab' (E-mail); Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail)
>Subject: Re: dlsw pass-thru
>
>
>When utilizing the passthru option over frame-relay you should map to
>'dlsw'
>and not 'llc2'. Try changing your frame maps to the following:
>
> frame-relay map dlsw 503 broadcast
>
>You will need to change all of your existing llc2 maps...
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "McCallum, Robert" <Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com>
>To: "'Ccielab' (E-mail)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; "Cisco@Groupstudy.
>Com
>(E-mail)" <cisco@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 8:02 AM
>Subject: dlsw pass-thru
>
>
> > Hi folks me again.
> >
> > I am having a problem getting dlsw lite with pass-thru to form peers
>between two routers. Basically they never form peers. The configs of
>both
>routers are posted below as well as the debug outputs from both. Any
>help
>would be great here as I have never been able to get this to work and am
>unsure
> > as to why.
> >
> > ROUTER 5
> >
> > source-bridge ring-group 500
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 137.1.5.5 group 235 border
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0.1 503 pass-thru
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0.1 502 pass-thru
> >
> > interface Serial0/0.1 multipoint
> > ip address 137.1.2.131 255.255.255.128
> > ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 robert
> > ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
> > frame-relay map dlsw 503 broadcast
> > frame-relay map dlsw 502 broadcast
> > frame-relay map llc2 503 broadcast
> > frame-relay map llc2 502 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 137.1.2.129 502 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 137.1.2.130 503 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 137.1.2.131 503
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 502
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 503
> >
> > ROUTER 3
> >
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 137.1.3.3 group 235 promiscuous
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0 305 pass-thru
> > dlsw bridge-group 1
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0
> > mac-address 0000.0000.1133
> > ip address 137.1.2.130 255.255.255.128
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 robert
> > ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
> > ip policy route-map pingr6
> > no fair-queue
> > clockrate 128000
> > frame-relay map dlsw 305 broadcast
> > frame-relay map llc2 305 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 137.1.2.129 305 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 137.1.2.130 305
> > frame-relay map ip 137.1.2.131 305 broadcast
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 305
> > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> >
> > ROUTER 5 OUTPUT FROM DEBUG DLSW
> >
> > 06:24:24: DLSw: START-FSTPFSM (peer on interface Serial0/0):
>event:ADMIN-OPEN CONNECTION state:
> > DISCONN
> > 06:24:24: DLSw: dfstp_action_a() attempting to connect peer on
>interface
>Serial0/0
> > 06:24:24: DLSw: Connection opened for peer on interface Serial0/0
> > 06:24:24: DLSw Direct: vencap failed - dropping packet for peer on
>interface Serial0/0
> > 06:24:24: DLSw: Capabilities send failed to peer on interface
>Serial0/0
> > 06:24:24: DLSw: END-FSTPFSM (peer on interface Serial0/0):
>state:DISCONN->WAIT_CAP
> >
> >
> > ROUTER 3 OUTPUT FROM DEBUG DLSW
> >
> > 06:22:49: DLSw: START-FSTPFSM (peer on interface Serial0/0):
>event:TIMER-TIMER EXPIRED state:WA
> > IT_CAP
> > 06:22:49: DLSw: dfstp_action_d() close connection for peer on
>interface
>Serial0/0
> > 06:22:49: DLSw: DIRECT aborting connection for peer on interface
>Serial0/0
> > 06:22:49: DLSw: END-FSTPFSM (peer on interface Serial0/0):
>state:WAIT_CAP->DISCONN
> >
> > Cheers for any help
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Robert McCallum
> > Ext 730 3448
> > DDI : 01415663448
> > Mobile : 07818002241
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:11 GMT-3