From: Michael Davis (miked@xxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Nov 09 2001 - 18:05:59 GMT-3
That's correct. You can use the two together to send unicast only.
Mike
#7303
----- Original Message -----
From: "Larson, Chris (Contractor)" <Chris.Larson@ed.gov>
To: "'Ouellette, Tim'" <tim.ouellette@eds.com>; "'Richard Foltz'"
<ccie2b@rfoltz.com>; "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 3:13 PM
Subject: RE: Rip Neigbor statment
> Actually, looking back through the docs, you may be right. It appears that
> when combined with the neighbor statement passive interface let's you send
> to specific neighbors.
>
> I have never used the 2 together and I am having trouble deciphering what
> this really means and should get it into my lab.
>
> I assume that since you can use them together to force updates to a
> particular host that when you use the neighbor command by itself that it
> will both unicast to the neighbor as well as attempt to broadcast, even
out
> the same interface that neighbor might be on.
>
> When you use the 2 together I suppose it blocks the broadcast and only
let's
> the uni through However, I am only guessing by whatI read in the docs. I
> have always been under the impression that passive keeps the interface
from
> advertiseing PERIOD. Apparently though that is not true.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ouellette, Tim [mailto:tim.ouellette@eds.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 2:20 PM
> To: 'Richard Foltz'; ccielab
> Subject: RE: Rip Neigbor statment
>
>
> So basically with the passive-interface set, it won't send the broadcasts
> but if you have the neighbour defined it'll still send out the unicast to
> those defined hosts whether passive is there or not? Does this sound
right?
>
> Tim
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richard Foltz [SMTP:ccie2b@rfoltz.com]
> > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 1:37 PM
> > To: RB; ccielab
> > Subject: Re: Rip Neigbor statment
> >
> > it wont if you have made the interface passive. If its not passive, then
> > it
> > will still send the broadcasts.
> >
> > Richard Foltz, CCIE#8339, CCNP-Voice, CCDP, MCSE+I, Network+, A+
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "RB" <slowgo@home.com>
> > To: "ccielab" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:27 PM
> > Subject: Rip Neigbor statment
> >
> >
> > > I know that the neigbor statement in rip sends out unicast updates to
> > that
> > > neighbor, but does it also send no other updates? Let's say you had
> > several
> > > routers on an ethernet segment with RIP running, and you used a
neigbor
> > > statement from a-b, does c no longer receive rip updates from a?
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > RBI
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:11 GMT-3