From: McCallum, Robert (Robert.McCallum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Fri Nov 09 2001 - 15:46:03 GMT-3
nope,
although without the promisc statement I am no longer getting the "vencap faile
d" message now all I am getting is that both peers cannot agree on capabilities
.
Can someone else try to setup 2 routers connected together by frame and try doi
ng a dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface dlci pass-thru, and see if it wor
ks. Maybe I am doing something completely and utterly out of the ordinary here
(doubt it though), but it would be good to check.
Again thanks for trying to help.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Gardiner [mailto:gardiner@sprint.net]
Sent: 09 November 2001 18:40
To: McCallum, Robert
Cc: 'fwells12'; 'Ccielab' (E-mail); Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail)
Subject: Re: dlsw pass-thru
I think the problem may be the promiscuous statement in Router 3. I
setup a similar scenario and couldn't get the connect until I removed
that flag.
"McCallum, Robert" wrote:
>
> Thanks everyone for your comments unfortunately however none of them fix the
problem.
>
> Frank I took of the frame llc2 statements with no joy.
> Chris Larson I took of the border statements with no joy.
> Eddie I already had those map statements in.
> Tom whether it is from or to token ring doesn't matter. The problem is the p
eers won't come up.
> Chris Stephenson I tried to use it on point-to-point links but still with no
joy.
>
> As I said at the start of the message thanks for your feedback. Unless there
is someone out there who has done this and knows the answer to this I hope to
hell that this isn't in the lab exam.
>
> Just in case there are any proctors reading this my name isn't really Robert
McCallum
>
> (just in case they say "hee hee hee lets give him the lab with the pass-thru
option in it" )
>
> Any other takers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fwells12 [mailto:fwells12@hotmail.com]
> Sent: 09 November 2001 16:39
> To: McCallum, Robert; 'Ccielab' (E-mail); Cisco@Groupstudy. Com (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: dlsw pass-thru
>
> When utilizing the passthru option over frame-relay you should map to 'dlsw'
> and not 'llc2'. Try changing your frame maps to the following:
>
> frame-relay map dlsw 503 broadcast
>
> You will need to change all of your existing llc2 maps...
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "McCallum, Robert" <Robert.McCallum@let-it-be-thus.com>
> To: "'Ccielab' (E-mail)" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; "Cisco@Groupstudy. Com
> (E-mail)" <cisco@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 8:02 AM
> Subject: dlsw pass-thru
>
> > Hi folks me again.
> >
> > I am having a problem getting dlsw lite with pass-thru to form peers
> between two routers. Basically they never form peers. The configs of both
> routers are posted below as well as the debug outputs from both. Any help
> would be great here as I have never been able to get this to work and am
> unsure
> > as to why.
> >
> > ROUTER 5
> >
> > source-bridge ring-group 500
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 137.1.5.5 group 235 border
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0.1 503 pass-thru
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0.1 502 pass-thru
> >
> > interface Serial0/0.1 multipoint
> > ip address 137.1.2.131 255.255.255.128
> > ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 robert
> > ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
> > frame-relay map dlsw 503 broadcast
> > frame-relay map dlsw 502 broadcast
> > frame-relay map llc2 503 broadcast
> > frame-relay map llc2 502 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 137.1.2.129 502 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 137.1.2.130 503 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 137.1.2.131 503
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 502
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 503
> >
> > ROUTER 3
> >
> > dlsw local-peer peer-id 137.1.3.3 group 235 promiscuous
> > dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface Serial0/0 305 pass-thru
> > dlsw bridge-group 1
> > !
> > interface Serial0/0
> > mac-address 0000.0000.1133
> > ip address 137.1.2.130 255.255.255.128
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 robert
> > ip ospf network point-to-multipoint
> > ip policy route-map pingr6
> > no fair-queue
> > clockrate 128000
> > frame-relay map dlsw 305 broadcast
> > frame-relay map llc2 305 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 137.1.2.129 305 broadcast
> > frame-relay map ip 137.1.2.130 305
> > frame-relay map ip 137.1.2.131 305 broadcast
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 305
> > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> >
> > ROUTER 5 OUTPUT FROM DEBUG DLSW
> >
> > 06:24:24: DLSw: START-FSTPFSM (peer on interface Serial0/0):
> event:ADMIN-OPEN CONNECTION state:
> > DISCONN
> > 06:24:24: DLSw: dfstp_action_a() attempting to connect peer on interface
> Serial0/0
> > 06:24:24: DLSw: Connection opened for peer on interface Serial0/0
> > 06:24:24: DLSw Direct: vencap failed - dropping packet for peer on
> interface Serial0/0
> > 06:24:24: DLSw: Capabilities send failed to peer on interface Serial0/0
> > 06:24:24: DLSw: END-FSTPFSM (peer on interface Serial0/0):
> state:DISCONN->WAIT_CAP
> >
> >
> > ROUTER 3 OUTPUT FROM DEBUG DLSW
> >
> > 06:22:49: DLSw: START-FSTPFSM (peer on interface Serial0/0):
> event:TIMER-TIMER EXPIRED state:WA
> > IT_CAP
> > 06:22:49: DLSw: dfstp_action_d() close connection for peer on interface
> Serial0/0
> > 06:22:49: DLSw: DIRECT aborting connection for peer on interface Serial0/0
> > 06:22:49: DLSw: END-FSTPFSM (peer on interface Serial0/0):
> state:WAIT_CAP->DISCONN
> >
> > Cheers for any help
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Robert McCallum
> > Ext 730 3448
> > DDI : 01415663448
> > Mobile : 07818002241
-- Thanks,Jason Gardiner Supervisor, Engineering Services Sprint <Insert Division Name>
"You can swim all day in the Sea of Knowledge and still come out completely dry. Most people do."
- Norton Juster
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:11 GMT-3