From: Church, Chuck (cchurch@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Mon Nov 05 2001 - 17:53:26 GMT-3
Don't bad things happen when redistributing between BGP and OSPF when the
RIDs don't match? Seems I heard something about that.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Joseph Ezerski
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 3:39 PM
To: 'Jerry Toomey'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: When to reboot a router?
Given that the CCIE R&S lab will be using IOS 12.1 across the board, when it
comes to OSPF, why not manually nail down your RIDs under the OSPF process.
That way you cannot get screwed by the additon of a loopback with better
numbers. Is anyone aware of any caveats doing it this way? I'd hate to
find out during the lab ;)
Ex:
router ospf 1
router-id 1.1.1.1
-Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Jerry Toomey
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 11:33 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: When to reboot a router?
Can any of you think of more scenarios that requires rebooting a router:
1. OSPF--if you add a second loopback, then reboot for the new process
ID.
2. ATM-- I've heard that sometimes you just have to reboot?
3. ?
=====
Jerry Toomey of http://www.wansend.com can be reached at 949-439-4685
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:04 GMT-3