From: Monty.Majszak@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon Nov 05 2001 - 13:37:32 GMT-3
Richard and the other Voice guru's:
In order to avoide latency and "jitter" when routing VoIP over a WAN, is it
a fact that you "have to" implement QOS? And you would do so by setting the
IP Precedence to 5 for the VoIP traffic? And one more question, where
implement the QOS, the router knows the VoIP traffic from regular IP data
traffic because of the obscure port #'s VoIP uses right?
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Foltz [mailto:ccie2b@rfoltz.com]
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:22 AM
To: Wright, Jeremy; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: DLSW
well, the cost is used to determine which peer to send traffic to, but the
connections will be made. you can use the backup peer command to do what you
want.
Richard Foltz, CCIE#8339, CCNP-Voice, CCDP, MCSE+I, Network+, A+
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wright, Jeremy" <JA_WRIGHT@admworld.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2001 9:39 AM
Subject: DLSW
> Other than using the backup command to specify alternatice peers using
> DLSW, does anyone know of a good source of information for DLSW costs
> and priorities? The Cisco CD and the Cisco Press Network Design and Case
> Studies mention it, but in no real detail.
> The reason being if I have a hub DLSW peer talking to two spokes, one
> with a cost set of 1 (primary) and the other with a cost set of 5
> (secondary), on the hubs remote-peer statement but they both still seem
> to connect even if I bring the primary up first and show a cost of 3
> under show dlsw capabilities? Maybe I am barking up the wrong tree here
> and priorities would be the preferred method but I can't seem to find
> any good reference material or examples.
> Thanks,
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:04 GMT-3