From: Nickel, Shawn (Shawn.Nickel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Nov 01 2001 - 19:02:18 GMT-3
The best practice would be to use a loopback interface. This way not all
traffic would be lost if one interface goes down
-----Original Message-----
From: tltill@carolina.rr.com [mailto:tltill@carolina.rr.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 3:53 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: DLSW peer question
Best practice is to use a loopback interface for your DLSW local-peer in
case
one of your two LAN interfaces fails.
> OK, you have a router which has more than one LAN interface it needs DLSW
> traffic forwarded from, let's say e0 and t0. It also has a loopback int
with
> ip ad 172.16.10.1/24. The ip's of the e0 and t0 interfaces are
172.16.20.1/24
> and 172.16.30.1/24 respectively. What ip address is the best practice to
use
> for your dlsw local-peer peer-id statement?
>
> Cheers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:00 GMT-3