From: fwells12 (fwells12@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Nov 01 2001 - 14:59:29 GMT-3
Ip default-network will only create a static route in your config if you use
a classless route in the command.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ademola Osindero" <osindero@lagos.sns.slb.com>
To: "Kirby, Ron" <Ron.Kirby@getronics.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 6:33 AM
Subject: RE: OSPF-IGRP redistribution
> Ron,
>
> Thanks for your response.
>
> I am assuming a real-lab environment where the rule clearly states that no
> static routes of any form can be configured. Using ip default-network will
> definitely create static route entry in the routing table and I would not
> want to use that except the proctor give's a nod to it.
> Area range would only create a summary that would appear on other ospf
> routers (sent in the LSU) but would not appear on the ASBR's routing
> table(needed for redistribution). Eventually I got summary-address doing
it
> but the lab sample was testing redistribution between different major
networks.
>
> I summarized on R2 using summary-address 172.17.0.0 and it did work.
>
> Thanks Ron.
>
>
>
> to nor preparing for my lab and At 08:43 AM 11/1/2001 -0500, Kirby, Ron
> wrote:
> >If your only concern is being able to connect to (ping) the OSPF
interfaces
> >from the IGRP segments, then Ip default network would provide that
ability.
> >There are stipulations on how that should be configured, ie to a
classfull
> >network, etc...And possibly where to configure it, for example should you
> >put it on the router doing redistribution or on the next IGRP router...
But
> >if you are trying to accomplish this with out any defaults routes in your
> >topology, the "area X range" command under OSPF with the networks in
> >question summarized to the mask present on the IGRP interface works as
well.
> >
> >
> >Ron Kirby
> >CCNP, MCSE, CNA
> >Network Engineer
> >Getronics, Houston ESC
> >713-852-5567 / 832-256-5403
> >ron.kirby@getronics.com
> >
> >This e-mail message and any attachments are confidential and may be
> >privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify me
> >immediately by replying to this message and please destroy all copies of
> >this message and attachments. Thank you.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Ademola Osindero [mailto:osindero@lagos.sns.slb.com]
> >Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 6:22 AM
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: OSPF-IGRP redistribution
> >
> >
> >I don't intend to start a long discussion on this topic but I need your
> >help.
> >
> >
> >On router R2, I have this routes
> >
> > 171.68.0.0/26 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> >C 171.68.62.64 is directly connected, Serial1
> > 172.17.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 6 subnets, 4 masks
> >C 172.17.59.128/30 is directly connected, Ethernet0
> >C 172.17.59.192/30 is directly connected, Virtual-TokenRing0
> >O IA 172.17.59.0/26 [110/65] via 172.17.59.33, 00:06:21, Serial0
> >C 172.17.59.32/28 is directly connected, Serial0
> >O 172.17.59.33/32 [110/64] via 172.17.59.33, 00:06:21, Serial0
> >O IA 172.17.59.65/32 [110/11] via 172.17.59.130, 00:06:21, Ethernet0
> >
> >and I intend to redistribute OSPF routes into IGRP running only on
> >interface s1 (171.68.62.64).
> >
> >The major networks are not the same 172.17.0.0 and 171.68.0.0. Can any
one
> >suggest how to go about this redistribution without considering an option
> >of static routes?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> >Osindero Ademola
> >Schlumberger Network Solutions
> >Tel: 234 1 261 0446 Ext 3227
> >Fax 234 1 262 1034
> >email:osindero@lagos.sns.slb.com
> Osindero Ademola
> Schlumberger Network Solutions
> Tel: 234 1 261 0446 Ext 3227
> Fax 234 1 262 1034
> email:osindero@lagos.sns.slb.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:00 GMT-3