BGP Confederations

From: McCallum, Robert (Robert.McCallum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Thu Nov 01 2001 - 12:25:34 GMT-3

• Next message: Stephen Oliver: "RE: OSPF-IGRP redistribution"
• Previous message: Bryan Ginman: "RE: Non-transit AS"
• Next in thread: Sijbren Beukenkamp: "Re: BGP Confederations"
• Maybe reply: Sijbren Beukenkamp: "Re: BGP Confederations"
• Maybe reply: McCallum, Robert: "RE: BGP Confederations"
• Maybe reply: fwells12: "Re: BGP Confederations"
• Maybe reply: fwells12: "Re: BGP Confederations"
• Maybe reply: Jason Sinclair: "RE: BGP Confederations"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

   
Hi,

If you have 4 routers within an confederation r1,r2,r3&r4. R1 has and EBGP con
nection to another As so therefore has the bgp confederation id and confed peer
 statements on it. My question is do all of the IBGP router (r2,r3&r4) require
 the confed statements on them even if they are only IBGP
routers??

14 days to go!! Starting to have some fun !!

Robert McCallum

• Next message: Stephen Oliver: "RE: OSPF-IGRP redistribution"
• Previous message: Bryan Ginman: "RE: Non-transit AS"
• Next in thread: Sijbren Beukenkamp: "Re: BGP Confederations"
• Maybe reply: Sijbren Beukenkamp: "Re: BGP Confederations"
• Maybe reply: McCallum, Robert: "RE: BGP Confederations"
• Maybe reply: fwells12: "Re: BGP Confederations"
• Maybe reply: fwells12: "Re: BGP Confederations"
• Maybe reply: Jason Sinclair: "RE: BGP Confederations"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 21 2002 - 06:45:00 GMT-3