From: Church, Chuck (cchurch@xxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Oct 30 2001 - 13:44:20 GMT-3
Static routes on 2, 3, and 4. Or policy routing on those instead. Each has
it's plus and minuses...
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
David Knot
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 3:18 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Secondary IP Address Problem
Hi guys
Can anyone suggest an alternative solution to the
following:
4 routers & a number of PCs on a LAN. PCs on a
different IP subnet (190.190.190.0/24) then the
routers (190.190.180.0/24). Router 1 has a secondary
IP address (190.190.190.1/24) from the subnet that PCs
have. All PCs have the default gateway R1s e0 IP
address (190.190.190.1/24). Routers run EIGRP & they
connect to other routers.
The requirement is to have full IP connectivity all
around i.e. all PCs should be able to ping all routers
& vice versa. With this set up R1 has no problem
communicating with PCs. Other routers cant.
Some solutions:
1) With secondary IP addresses on other 3 routers R2,
R3, R4 then it works. OR
2) If I turn off split-horizon on R1 with no ip
split-horizon eigrp 99 on e0 of R1 then R1 advertises
this 2ndary route to R2, R3, R4 then it works.
Can you think of any other way?
Thanks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:29 GMT-3