RE: Question on DLSW+

From: Bauer, Rick (BAUERR@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Tue Oct 30 2001 - 12:03:01 GMT-3


   
This would work if the mask was applied properly "F"s = don't care and
applied with the
dlsw peer dmac-output-list. Also DLSW is always canonical.

-----Original Message-----
From: Geir Jensen [mailto:geir@hfk.vgs.no]
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:02 AM
To: Choi, Howard CW; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Question on DLSW+

Hi Howard,

Wouldn't this do the trick?

r1(config)#access-list 700 permit 4000.1000.0000 FFFF.FFFF.0000
r1(config)#access-list 700 permit 4000.2000.0000 FFFF.FFFF.0000

r1(config)# int e0
r1(config-if)#bridge-group 1 input-address-list 700

assuming your addresses are canonical

Geir Jensen
CCNP,CCDP

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Choi, Howard CW
        Sent: Tue 10/30/2001 3:33 AM
        To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
        Cc:
        Subject: Question on DLSW+
        
        

        Hi Group,
        
        Suppose a DLSW+ TCP connection has been setup between R1(E0) to
R2(To0). I
        would like to allow only source mac-addresses in the range
4000.1000.xxxx to
        4000.2000.xxxx on interface E0 of R1 to use this DLSW+
connection to reach
        R2.
        
        Please advise any feasible methods to achieve. Thanks.
        
        Howard Choi
        CCNP, CCDP
        



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:28 GMT-3