From: Brian Hescock (bhescock@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Oct 28 2001 - 22:33:42 GMT-3
It's definitely in the later 12.0T code, which means it will be in 12.1
and later. I don't think it was in the later 12.0 mainline code though
and we usually only add new features to T code, not mainline (although
isn't a really "feature" per se). I just did a quick search and
couldn't locate it but I didn't look too extensively though. You might
want to check the release notes for 12.0 and 12.0T and it will probably
have a blurb in there.
Brian
EA Louie wrote:
>then I guess the newer code that allows networks to be specified with masks
>in eigrp would be a good solution.
>
>Is that available in 12.1, or was 12.2 the first release of that feature?
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Brian Hescock" <bhescock@cisco.com>
>To: "routerjocky" <elouie@yahoo.com>
>Cc: "David Knot" <david_knot@yahoo.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 7:36 PM
>Subject: Re: OSPF <-> EIGRP Redistribution
>
>
>>David and I have been discussing it off-line and we haven't found a way
>>to do it in earlier code (i.e no wildcard bits for eigrp).
>> Passive-interface won't work, it prevents advertisement of updates out
>>that interface but you still have that network added to eigrp topology
>>table and would advertise it out any other eigrp interfaces that you
>>didn't put passive-int on. Configuring "network 10.0.0.0" under router
>>eigrp turns on eigrp on all interfaces with 10.x.x.x and places it in
>>the eigrp topology table. It would then be known as an internal eigrp
>>route, admin distance 90. The ospf route would be redistributed and
>>would be an external eigrp route, admin distance 170. So somehow you
>>would have to make the route learned via ospf a lower admin distance or
>>an equal admin distance and tweak the metrics when it's redistributed.
>> Perhaps there's a hack to do it I hadn't thought of but I looked at all
>>available commands in a route-map and haven't come across anything.
>>Note: the ospf route isn't learned via ospf, it's a directly
>>connected network on the router.
>>
>>Brian
>>
>>routerjocky wrote:
>>
>>>just off the top of my head, passive interfaces in conjunction with no
>>>auto-summary on eigrp should probably work, because of the way passive
>>>interface works with eigrp (turns off the routing protocol on those
>>>interfaces)
>>>
>>>-e-
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "David Knot" <david_knot@yahoo.com>
>>>To: "Brian Hescock" <bhescock@cisco.com>
>>>Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>>>Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 3:09 PM
>>>Subject: Re: OSPF <-> EIGRP Redistribution
>>>
>>>
>>>>Brian
>>>>
>>>>Agree that passive-interface won't work!
>>>>
>>>>I've tried distance command on Router A but since the
>>>>route is directly connected one, it doesn't sort it
>>>>out.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>>
>>>>--- Brian Hescock <bhescock@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>David,
>>>>> The response someone gave you with
>>>>>passive-interface won't work but
>>>>>what should work (if you have older code) is use the
>>>>>"distance" command
>>>>>to set the admin distance higher so the ospf route
>>>>>is preferred.
>>>>>You''ll still have the route in the eigrp topology
>>>>>table but it won't
>>>>>be in the routing table.
>>>>>
>>>>>Brian
>>>>>
>>>>>David Knot wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi guys
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Can someone help with this OSPF <-> EIGRP
>>>>>>redistribution lab exercise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Router B has 2 serial 0, serial 1 & Ethernet 0
>>>>>>interfaces. The serials are running OSPF on them &
>>>>>>they lead to OSPF IP cloud. The e0 is running EIGRP
>>>>>>
>>>>>on
>>>>>
>>>>>>it & they leads to EIGRP IP cloud. All IP subnet
>>>>>>addresses have prefix of 180.99.X.X.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The problem is when EIGRP is configured it grapes
>>>>>>
>>>>>all
>>>>>
>>>>>>180.99.X.X interfaces (including the s0 & s1 IP
>>>>>>subnets) & sends them out. The requirement is to
>>>>>>
>>>>>have
>>>>>
>>>>>>OSPF on 2 serials ONLY (this is easy since OSPF
>>>>>>network command is granular) & EIGRP is to run on
>>>>>>
>>>>>e0
>>>>>
>>>>>>ONLY (this is where I need help since EIGRP network
>>>>>>command is NOT granular). I tried a distribute list
>>>>>>(distribute-list 99 out e0 with ACL denying the 2
>>>>>>serial subnets). But this stops OSPF to EIGRP
>>>>>>redistribution of these 2 subnets.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Help please!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:27 GMT-3