From: Erick B. (erickbe@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Oct 28 2001 - 21:45:31 GMT-3
Which version of 12.1 exactly? When I looked into
this a few months back, I found it still worked in
12.1 mainline and not 12.1T.
--- kenairs <kenairs@hotmail.com> wrote:
> HI Ravi ,
> I tried that and it works fine for version 12.0 .
> But coming this nov , the
> routers in the lab will be loaded version 12.1 ( am
> i right ? ) .I try
> redistribute connected in version 12.1 but it
> doesn't work. So how are we
> going to overcome this problem ? The static route to
> null 0 works but we are
> not allow :( .
>
> Regards
> ken
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: kym blair <kymblair@hotmail.com>
> To: <gkats@algosystems.gr>;
> <s_ravichandran@hotmail.com>;
> <w.schoots@chello.nl>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 2:37 PM
> Subject: RE: SOLUTION: OSPF Summary-Address (for
> redistrib into IGRP)
>
>
> > Yorgos,
> >
> > Your suggestion to create a static of the /25
> connected using /24 to null0
> > so it matches the /24 IGRP interface to
> redistribute into worked great.
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Kym
> >
> >
> > >From: "Yorgos Katsikogiannis"
> <gkats@algosystems.gr>
> > >Reply-To: "Yorgos Katsikogiannis"
> <gkats@algosystems.gr>
> > >To: "'Ravi'" <s_ravichandran@hotmail.com>,
> "'kym blair'"
> > ><kymblair@hotmail.com>, <w.schoots@chello.nl>,
> > ><ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Subject: RE: SOLUTION: OSPF Summary-Address (for
> redistrib into IGRP)
> > >Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 19:32:21 +0300
> > >
> > >Hi Ravi,
> > >
> > >there is one more thing that you possibly could
> do to overcome this.
> > >
> > >You could create a static route of your
> *connected interface* using the
> > >major network subnet of the IGRP to a null
> interface (i.e if your IGRP
> > >is using /24, then you will have to use ip route
> xx.xx.xx.xx
> > >255.255.255.0 null0 ) and then redistribute this
> static route into your
> > >IGRP routing protocol.
> > >
> > >You may check see that your routes are now
> advertised correct, but the
> > >bother is that you cannot use this kind of
> solution under lab
> > >circumstances.
> > >
> > >Yorgos
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > >Ravi
> > >Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 7:02 PM
> > >To: kym blair; w.schoots@chello.nl;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > >Subject: Re: SOLUTION: OSPF Summary-Address (for
> redistrib into IGRP)
> > >
> > >
> > >Hi Kym,
> > >
> > >If the connected interface that you are talking
> about is not in area 0 ,
> > >you may still use area range command on the other
> side of the link. OR
> > >You can do redis connected and use summary
> address. It works up to IOS
> > >12.0.
> > >
> > >I found problem when I used the same command on
> IOS 12.1. It does not
> > >redistribute the connected interface if the
> interface is already in any
> > >of the ospf area. It works for any interface
> which are not in any
> > >routing process. Try by using secondary address
> to overcome this
> > >problem.
> > >
> > >Any one has better solution please add.
> > >
> > >Regards,
> > >Ravi
> > >
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: kym blair <kymblair@hotmail.com>
> > >To: <w.schoots@chello.nl>;
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > >Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 8:54 AM
> > >Subject: SOLUTION: OSPF Summary-Address (for
> redistrib into IGRP)
> > >
> > >
> > > > Willy's solution to use area range at the ABR
> before the ASBR worked;
> > > > both became OSPF IA /24 networks and
> redistributed into IGRP:
> > > >
> > > > >If you would use an area range command on R5,
> then it should work:
> > > > >area 0 range 152.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 area 0
> range 152.1.2.0
> > > > >255.255.255.0
> > > >
> > > > Ravi's comment explains:
> > > >
> > > > Your R6 (ASBR between OSPF and IGRP) routing
> table shows both the
> > > > network
> > >as
> > > > IA entry. To summarize a IA route, you can use
> area range command on
> > > > ABRs. Summary address to summarize routes
> learned from another routing
> > >
> > > > process, and to be used on ASBRs. As your
> routes are IA routes,
> > > > summary address
> > >will
> > > > not work.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the help; also thanks to those who
> offered to recreate this
> > >
> > > > scenario on their labs.
> > > >
> > > > ***** This leads to one more question: ******
> > > >
> > > > If we had a directly connected interface on R6
> (ASBR) with a /25 mask,
> > >
> > > > how would we summarize to a /24 to get it into
> IGRP (static works, but
> > >
> > > > for
> > >this
> > > > scenario cannot be used)? It wouldn't be an
> OSPF IA route, so we
> > > > couldn't use area range at the previous ABR,
> and summary-address
> > > > doesn't work (I tried).
> > > >
> > > > Kym
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:27 GMT-3