From: routerjocky (elouie@xxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sun Oct 28 2001 - 21:16:19 GMT-3
just off the top of my head, passive interfaces in conjunction with no
auto-summary on eigrp should probably work, because of the way passive
interface works with eigrp (turns off the routing protocol on those
interfaces)
-e-
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Knot" <david_knot@yahoo.com>
To: "Brian Hescock" <bhescock@cisco.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 3:09 PM
Subject: Re: OSPF <-> EIGRP Redistribution
> Brian
>
> Agree that passive-interface won't work!
>
> I've tried distance command on Router A but since the
> route is directly connected one, it doesn't sort it
> out.
>
> Thanks
>
> --- Brian Hescock <bhescock@cisco.com> wrote:
> > David,
> > The response someone gave you with
> > passive-interface won't work but
> > what should work (if you have older code) is use the
> > "distance" command
> > to set the admin distance higher so the ospf route
> > is preferred.
> > You''ll still have the route in the eigrp topology
> > table but it won't
> > be in the routing table.
> >
> > Brian
> >
> > David Knot wrote:
> >
> > >Hi guys
> > >
> > >Can someone help with this OSPF <-> EIGRP
> > >redistribution lab exercise.
> > >
> > >Router B has 2 serial 0, serial 1 & Ethernet 0
> > >interfaces. The serials are running OSPF on them &
> > >they lead to OSPF IP cloud. The e0 is running EIGRP
> > on
> > >it & they leads to EIGRP IP cloud. All IP subnet
> > >addresses have prefix of 180.99.X.X.
> > >
> > >The problem is when EIGRP is configured it grapes
> > all
> > >180.99.X.X interfaces (including the s0 & s1 IP
> > >subnets) & sends them out. The requirement is to
> > have
> > >OSPF on 2 serials ONLY (this is easy since OSPF
> > >network command is granular) & EIGRP is to run on
> > e0
> > >ONLY (this is where I need help since EIGRP network
> > >command is NOT granular). I tried a distribute list
> > >(distribute-list 99 out e0 with ACL denying the 2
> > >serial subnets). But this stops OSPF to EIGRP
> > >redistribution of these 2 subnets.
> > >
> > >Help please!
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:27 GMT-3