From: Brian Lodwick (xpranax@xxxxxxxxxxx)
Date: Sat Oct 27 2001 - 11:18:40 GMT-3
Oh, well that was what I thought.
So can you use Mobile IP as an IGP?
I know you can go into router mode with router mobile and specify networks.
So can you use Mobile IP as the IGP? and what would this do?
When you specify the mobile arp timers on interfaces does that automatically
enable Mobile IP as a routing protocol since then after you can just
redistribute Mobile into your IGP and it works?
Sorry for the 20 questions.
>>>Brian
>From: Khalid Nafie <knafie@ncr.com.kw>
>Reply-To: Khalid Nafie <knafie@ncr.com.kw>
>To: Brian Lodwick <xpranax@hotmail.com>, knafie@ncr.com.kw
>CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: LAM Vs. Mobile Ip
>Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 21:21:03 +0300
>
>Actually this isn't every thing, the mobile ip is a tunneling technique and
>its configuration is totally different.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Brian Lodwick [mailto:xpranax@hotmail.com]
>Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:50 AM
>To: knafie@ncr.com.kw
>Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Re: LAM Vs. Mobile Ip
>
>
>I had thought they were one in the same, the only difference being LAM
>allows a user go from one ethernet bridge-group to another on the same
>router using the bridge-group command and ip mobile arp timers on the
>ethernet interfaces.
>Then Mobile IP being when you allow a user go anywhere within your domain
>by
>
>redistributing mobile into the IGP?
>
> >>>Brian
>
>
>
> >From: Khalid Nafie <knafie@ncr.com.kw>
> >Reply-To: Khalid Nafie <knafie@ncr.com.kw>
> >To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >Subject: LAM Vs. Mobile Ip
> >Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 12:49:27 +0300
> >
> >Dear All,
> > Can any one put some light on when to use LAM and when to use Mobile
> >IP, in boot camp20 they r using LAM can't this done by mobile IP.
> >thx
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jun 20 2002 - 22:33:26 GMT-3